Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outrageous new conspiracy theory about woman who acted strangely while sat behind Trump as he was shot
Daily Mail ^ | 7/19/24 | Bethan Sextan

Posted on 07/19/2024 12:23:53 PM PDT by hardspunned

A wild conspiracy theory about the woman who was acting strangely behind Donald Trump as he was shot has been condemned.

The woman sparked suspicion over her bizarrely-relaxed behavior after she failed to flinch and even pulled out her phone as shots rang out at the Pennsylvania rally last week.

An outlandish conspiracy theory has since emerged claiming that the woman was FBI assistant director Janeen DiGuiseppi - and that she was directing the sniper who almost killed Trump.

They also alleged the woman they claimed as DiGuiseppi gave a nod before gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire.

But both conservatives and liberals have since condemned the theory.

'If you believe the assistant director of the FBI was sitting front row at a Trump rally to “give instructions” to the shooter, you are an absolute moron. Like, next-level stupid,' a Red State journalist known only as Bonchie wrote on X.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: nextlevelstupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: realcleanguy

“The shooter never had formal sniper training and fired a series of shots at 400+ yards”

I’ve seen 154 yards and 140 yards given as the distance.


61 posted on 07/19/2024 1:38:12 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Are you ready for Black Lives MAGA? It's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

140 yards not 400+.

With properly equipped rifle, just medium skill level required, if that.


62 posted on 07/19/2024 1:42:58 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

3 overseas accounts?

Were they porn sites?


63 posted on 07/19/2024 1:43:39 PM PDT by texanyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
I would hope so too but in this day and age , who knows.

Grubhub scans an ID if alcohol is being delivered, so the technology is out there.

64 posted on 07/19/2024 1:44:41 PM PDT by OldHarbor (strained statutory arguments, appeals to inconsistent history, reliance on out-of-circuit authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

That video is 11 months old. She could definitely lose some weight and if you pull her hair back and put sunglasses on her... it definitely resembles her.

The nod in the direction of the gunfire just seconds before the shooting starts and her cool demeanor is suspicious, no? Even if it isn’t her.


65 posted on 07/19/2024 1:45:42 PM PDT by bayliving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

She’s not holding up a “card”, she is holding up a Trump campaign sign. Really suspicious behavior at a Trump rally. Hmm.


66 posted on 07/19/2024 1:52:42 PM PDT by Kathy in OC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned
Full retards on all sides coming out of the woodwork.

Can we just give Alex Jones his money back at this point?

67 posted on 07/19/2024 1:53:00 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

Right, an ex-sniper said easy shot for an amateur at that distance. Said an expert could have done it with a pistol. Here’s another wild guess: He took his time with the first shot and came within inch of a moving head. He was probably shook up after that about possible return fire and fired more rapidly with poor aim.

Read a “claim” that ballistic analysis shows that 3 different guns were fired.


68 posted on 07/19/2024 1:53:40 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Are you ready for Black Lives MAGA? It's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That’s certainly a possibility.


69 posted on 07/19/2024 1:56:33 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I bet at that moment she didn’t realize she was in the line of fire. The bullet whizzed by before the sound of the shot. I think the crowd didn’t stampede because of the secret service converging on Trump.


70 posted on 07/19/2024 1:59:24 PM PDT by DeplorablePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I don’t have reason to believe the woman was Janeen, but I’d like to know what Janeen says...and what the woman says.


71 posted on 07/19/2024 2:01:47 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I noticed her odd behavior myself.


72 posted on 07/19/2024 2:01:55 PM PDT by Theophilus (covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Why would she identify herself, provided she’s even heard of this theory?

She’s probably just someone who was there and has every right to her privacy.


73 posted on 07/19/2024 2:03:11 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in OC

Never heard that one.


74 posted on 07/19/2024 2:06:38 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bayliving
again, "one man near the shooters location was screaming "He has a gun""

said, "The nod in the direction of the gunfire just seconds before the shooting starts and her cool demeanor is suspicious, no? Even if it isn’t her"

She was looking in that direction. She likely did what most did: Assume the police and USSS counter snipers would respond to the threat. They did NOT. The surprise she had is they didn't act against the threat and now her president and herself is under fire.

If you've ever been under a real threat. The shock comes later. At least with me that is what happens.
75 posted on 07/19/2024 2:07:08 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

You’re lucky! Crazy stuff out there.


76 posted on 07/19/2024 2:08:12 PM PDT by Kathy in OC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

Yes, she has her right to privacy. Although I think there are records of who was allowed to sit in the VIP section.

She could identify herself to explain the situation and keep the nation from being further divided over this.

If she was deaf, as somebody suggested could be the case, she could explain that. If her nod was because she saw somebody in the crowd and acknowledged them, she could say that.

When the country is divided into two parties screaming at each other and hurling speculation around, it is patriotic to try to help both sides get the answers they need. That is what “uniting” means right now. It means rather than choosing to belligerently refuse to engage in the processing of the evidence that would reveal the truth, we line up on one side or the other and let the firing happen all around us.

We need to get over that.

The left uses the “tone the rhetoric down” idea to try to silence the other side. The temptation will be for us to do the same. What the country needs is something different. The word Trump used was “healing”. Healing comes from the truth. What we owe all our fellow Americans right now is truth, because truth is the only thing that can bring us back together again as one united people. Instead of sassing back at each other we need to be giving each other answers. Real answers, because that is the only thing that can heal us. With God’s help.


77 posted on 07/19/2024 2:11:58 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Should be

“When the country is divided into two parties screaming at each other and hurling speculation around, it is patriotic to try to help both sides get the answers they need. That is what “uniting” means right now. It means doing that, rather than choosing to belligerently refuse to engage in the processing of the evidence that would reveal the truth, lining up on one side or the other, and letting the firing happen all around us.”


78 posted on 07/19/2024 2:19:49 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

It was feet not yards. Estimates/different reports say 130-150 yards.


79 posted on 07/19/2024 2:26:53 PM PDT by LibertyWoman (America, the Handwriting is on the Wall. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: virgil

“I heard another one today that they found Crooks has $1 million in an overseas account. Just hearsay. Probably rumor.”

That’s interesting. I wonder how someone would latch onto that dough. Probably whomever coordinated this event has access to it in some way.


80 posted on 07/19/2024 2:39:18 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (It's not as if Biden has the nuclear codes or anything. 😳)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson