Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

One would think it was practically designed to be that way........................


3 posted on 06/28/2024 11:04:54 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

It’s the Kodak formula.
Gets windows for free and pay for the anti malware and virul protection.


4 posted on 06/28/2024 11:06:46 AM PDT by Jonty30 (He hunted a mammoth for me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; ShadowAce
> One would think it was practically designed to be that way.

Windows began life as an outgrowth of MSDOS, an application running on MSDOS, then NT was born, and slowly with XP and Vista it tried to bolt on some semblance of security.

Windows has improved tremendously since then. Win7 was outstanding in many respects, and Win10 was an security improvement over that, although it also introduced some unloved quasi-spyware features.

But it's still the case that "back-compatibility" with the older releases has been one sticking point throughout. Microsoft's people just can't wrap their head around the concept of "Security-By-Design" and instead they settle for "Security-By-Incremental-Bolt-On-Patches".

It's unfortunate. But it's unavoidable, given the Microsoft mentality, and the perceived necessity of remaining compatible with ancient releases.

7 posted on 06/28/2024 11:15:31 AM PDT by dayglored (Strange Women Lying In Ponds Distributing Swords! Arthur Pendragon in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson