You mean there are other Dem bureaucrats in Wyoming other than Lizzy?
Masterson’s Tuesday filing asked the court to deny the county’s motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction and award his clients their attorney fees and costs.
He told the judge that his clients just want to solve the issue.
“I think it can be solved,” he said, adding that, “This is not the way to do it.”
Have a local situation. City lost the ruling and decided to appeal, rather than sit and talk about the issue.
Just wait until the water rights issues emerge.
Be careful what you pray for...
“The couple bought the property along the road in September 2023.”
Chit can happen when the non-locals show up with Buck$.
I’d go with annual rent from the BLM. Equal to my annual Income Taxes.
Happens all the time in west Texas.
DOT cut a road though my ranch one time going nowhere and without anything resembling a right of way. Notified them immediately, but they didn’t stop. Finally had to sue. At the injunction hearing they said “oops my bad”.
I use it now to land my plane.
Might depend on the state. Is nome states:
If a roadway is used, even in the middle of a property, and there is no sign “Right to pass revokable at any time”, and if the road is maintained with eqipmenmt, that may make it a passageway that cannot be blocked.
Dang. Is this possible? “She also told the court the county earlier this month initiated a process of establishing the road through “prescription” or “adverse possession.” Governments can be abusive but they think they can claim “squatters rights”? Of course the negated that by saying the installed gates with the owner’s permission.
If they own it why did they need permission?
It certainly sounds like there is an easement. Once people have been using a road for 25 years or so, an easement exists.
That’s a lot of money the owners owe the country for maintaining their road for years.