Posted on 06/16/2024 6:37:18 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Just another reminder that the story which about 10 days ago was BLASTED over the news that a Facebook poster named Michael Anderson who claimed his juror cousin in the Manhattan Kangaroo Court declared the jury had already found Trump guilty the day BEFORE the verdict was handed down has NOT been debunked. And the big TELL for that is that the media has DROPPED this story like a hot potato. Believe me, if this story had been investigated and proven to be false, it would be all over the news.
So has this claim by Michael Anderson been investigated? He later claimed he was just a "shit-poster" who made up lots of fake postings? So where are his fake postings?
Some have laughably claimed that Michael Anderson himself debunked his own story. So now if a perp denies he did something, that somehow "debunks" the crime? If Anderson does have a cousin (apparently female) on the jury, that gives him a strong motive to pretend his own claim has been debunked ...by him.
Something would be really wrong for CORRUPT Judge Juan Merchan to sentence Trump on July 11 if this story has NOT been investigated. What is happening now is the media is ignoring the story and hoping it will just go away. Why? Maybe they know Michael Anderson's post was too valid for comfort.
Nope. Nothing. Which tells me something. Namely that this story has NOT yet been "debunked."
Presumably, as initially reported, the person learned of the coming guilty verdict before the case had been given to the jury for deliberation. If that’s the case, and it’s true, it would be a problem.
What part of the jury instructions to NOT discuss the case outside of the jury room do you not understand? A juror (apparently female juror) has been claimed by Michael Anderson to have given him inside info on their verdict the day BEFORE the verdict was handed down. A big NO-NO.
So what? If true if proves the jury discussed the case outside of court against their instructions, so the jury is tainted and thus the result is tainted.
How hard would it be to find out if Michael Anderson has a (female) cousin who was a juror? And after that juror was ID’d it would not be a big problem to check her (as well as Anderson’s) private communications.
If there is anything to the story, the defense team will be all over it. Because it is absolute grounds for a mistrial. Not even this judge could ignore it. If they are not, then there is likely nothing there.
but the court system doesn’t breathlessly announce its every move to the press.
The Democratic Marxists do when it gives them and advantage.
One thing about the judges letter. In the judges letter, he put quotes around what the poster said. That is not what he said. The judge is paraphrasing it. Why put the quotes around it. A judge knows better than that. here is what the judge said :
“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work”. This is what the cousin actually posted: “Thank you for all your hard against the MAGA crazies. My cousin is a juror on Trumps criminal case and they’re going to convict him tomorrow according to her. Thank you New York courts”. Is the judge trying to hide how biased the jury is?
This flagrant juror misconduct is only one of several dozen items that should disqualify the entire judgement.
The judge and prosecutor must be removed from office.
Merchan is a judge on the New York Supreme Court.
In New York, due to wacky history, the Supreme Court is the county level trial court. The highest court in the State of New York is the Court of Appeals
Thank you! I was wondering about this this morning.
Your post was well written and well argued.
If Judge calls mistrial, Judge could keep Trump in trial for months, effecting his campaigning.
Appeals will allow the Judge to be found of guilt of so many errors and injustices.
The Judge of course sentence Trump to serve time in jail while waiting for appeal.
If the case goes to appeal, EVENTUALLY it will reach SCOTUS, where the corrupt judge will be publicly excoriated for his handling of the case.
If the judge declares a mistrial, his decisions during the trial will not be publicly reviewed or questioned. The lefties will have gotten their talking points for "convicted felon" Trump, and it will all go quietly away.
Those are jail house tats.
If a juror has been speaking to someone OUTSIDE the pool of jurors, they are subjecting themselves to being INFLUENCED by that outsider and perhaps CHANGING their verdict upon being polled by the judge during issuance of the verdict.
IMO, Judge Merchan was the one who sounded the alarm over Anderson's post because Merchan wants a RETRIAL so that HE CAN ORDER TRUMP TO BE IN HIS COURTROOM FOR ANOTHER 6 TO 8 WEEKS. This is a great way for the deep state to keep Trump on a leash without imprisoning him.
The NY Supreme Court is the trial courts in NY, not the court of last resort.
So who in the NY Supreme Court system dropped the dime ?
good post....arg...I gotta read more before i post ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.