[bitt]

https://www.science.org/content/article/researchers-plan-retract-landmark-alzheimers-paper-containing-doctored-images

[Fire137]

This is why we question science

[BobL]

All good and fine, but will they get to REAL CAUSE of Alzheimer’s, which is suppressed cholesterol levels due to the mass use of Statins?

[LS]

I always thought the Polio vax was a “good” vax, effective, etc.

A couple of years ago I read “The Moth in the Iron Lung” by Forest Maready who makes a strong case that the cause of Polio was DDT/pesticides in the food system, and when DDT was banned before the vax was available the Polio rates fell. There is also a very good, controversial book, “The River,” that argues that the Belgian Congo oral polio vaccines used chimps, not green monkeys and that their tissue gave rise to SIV that jumped to humans.

[PeterPrinciple]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvain_Lesn%C3%A9

---

the victim?

[PGalt]

Thanks to every poster. Life/health BUMP

[Carry_Okie]

Are these people saying that any modified image is not publishable?

I modify images all the time, for the purpose of correcting lighting problems when they were photographed. I deliberately under-expose digital images for that purpose, because reflected glare that goes to white is not correctable. My goal in doing that editorial work is to portray the image as I saw it as accurately as possible. How is such a problem?

Hence, for the article to say "modified" as if it were bad without discussing what those specific modifications were is beyond confusing.

[Jeff Chandler]

Follow the sciiiiience.

[VanShuyten]

Beta amyloid might not be the ultimate cause of Alzheimer’s, but it is present in nearly every case, so the connection is there, if not clear.

“ The paper helped create and sustain the theory that amyloid protein buildups caused the symptoms of Alzheimer’s Disease…”

That’s untrue. The amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer’s has been around since the 1970s. There is ample evidence that the build up of amyloid in neurons leads to their death.

[LachlanMinnesota]

Double blinds - replication - peer review - disclosure of data - funding not contingent upon results - Non-Fauci direction -

What is your scientific base today?

What consequence for scientific fraudsters?

[Bob434]

Wow! Sad that some folks are so desperate to be the ones who solve a disease problem, or discover th3 cause or whatever, resort to lying and manipulation to gain attention.

Alzheimers is a terrible terrible disease, and lots of people try to play on the emotions and desperation of sufferers and their families- youtube is chockerblock full of promises and wild claims about either spring or helping peop.e with the condition

So many self proclaimed “naturalists” (or herbalists) making outlandish claims, usually saying things like “medical doctors don’t want you to onow that alzheimers can be controlled” or some such claim.

[Captain Peter Blood]

Old news this came out at least 2 years ago on the phony data manipulation.

[logi_cal869]

Shocked, I tell ya.

/s

[Old Student]

This is how science is supposed to work! Someone has an idea, presents what info they can generate to support it, and others test it out. If they confirm the data presented, it supports the conclusions. If not, they try to get more data to prove or disprove it.

Back when Science was new, they wrote letters to one another to discuss it, and joined groups to discuss and test their results. Took year and years to gather and evaluate the data. We can share it faster, but it still takes time and money and effort to confirm or deny.

Of course, you’re not supposed to fake or manipulate the data, either.

[catnipman]

remember kiddies: FOLLOW THE SCIENCE! Anthony Fauci says so!

[aquila48]

Bottom line....

“This is an age of scientific scandals. Science is now a multi-billion dollar industry, and one that gets far too little scrutiny. That has to change.”

[ransomnote]

This retraction may or may not be medical regime maneuverings.

The paper they are retracting purports to prove that "amyloid protein buildups caused the symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease ". The investigation of the paper started in 2022.

The Covid 'shot' is said by some independent researchers to create extensive amyloid plaques some of which collect in the veins/arteries and clog them with what looks like white strings, which some morticians have also reported finding.

A 69 year old woman with no other known illnesses had the following write up in her Covid 'vaccine' record in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System). Note there never will be an investigation to prove what caused her illnesses, particularly as it looks like it may be the 'shot'. Sadly, no intervention is planned.

Doctor's Write-up: Had Moderna COVID vaccine approximately 1pm on 2/17. Developed headache and right visual field loss approximately 8pm on 2/18. Presented to our hospital at 5pm on 2/19 with progression of aforementioned symptoms and found to have left intraparenchymal hemorrhage with midline shift. Her symptoms are currently stable. Our neurosurgical team is not planning any surgical intervention. MRI of her brain demonstrates potential amyloid deposits, which are likely causative.

ransomnote: Another record for a 80 year old woman detailed that she already had dementia and issues with proteins in her body (amyloidosis), no one told her that the shot had proteins in it. Within 2 weeks of Covid 'vaccination' her eyes swelled, her hands hurt, she had pins/needles sensation up and down her legs, and she had some kind of episode at home (sensation over her body). The physician record notes 'aggravated condition', so 'the shot' probably doesn't play well with those who already have amyloidosis.

Of the 101 vaccines for which adverse events occurred after vaccination, only a handful reported the occurence of amyloidosis after Covid 'vaccination.' As usual, Covid 'vaccine' patients reported almost all of the cases of the symptom/illness in question.

I know medical fraud is rampant. But we've seen good medical papers retracted (lancet) or denied publication entirely (ivermectin, blood clots etc.) based on the censorship demands of the medical regime in D.C. in regards to the Covid 'shot. This may be a case of trying to detatch documentation from perhaps an upswing in dementia following covid 'vaccination' amyloidosis.

[9YearLurker]

I’m the senior writer and researcher, but it somehow just happened. How was I to know?

[TexasFreeper2009]

imagine the future retractions of all the global warming research!

[If You Want It Fixed - Fix It]

Science don’t lie! You caveman!