This retraction may or may not be medical regime maneuverings.
The paper they are retracting purports to prove that "amyloid protein buildups caused the symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease ". The investigation of the paper started in 2022.
The Covid 'shot' is said by some independent researchers to create extensive amyloid plaques some of which collect in the veins/arteries and clog them with what looks like white strings, which some morticians have also reported finding.
A 69 year old woman with no other known illnesses had the following write up in her Covid 'vaccine' record in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System). Note there never will be an investigation to prove what caused her illnesses, particularly as it looks like it may be the 'shot'. Sadly, no intervention is planned.
Doctor's Write-up: Had Moderna COVID vaccine approximately 1pm on 2/17. Developed headache and right visual field loss approximately 8pm on 2/18. Presented to our hospital at 5pm on 2/19 with progression of aforementioned symptoms and found to have left intraparenchymal hemorrhage with midline shift. Her symptoms are currently stable. Our neurosurgical team is not planning any surgical intervention. MRI of her brain demonstrates potential amyloid deposits, which are likely causative.
ransomnote: Another record for a 80 year old woman detailed that she already had dementia and issues with proteins in her body (amyloidosis), no one told her that the shot had proteins in it. Within 2 weeks of Covid 'vaccination' her eyes swelled, her hands hurt, she had pins/needles sensation up and down her legs, and she had some kind of episode at home (sensation over her body). The physician record notes 'aggravated condition', so 'the shot' probably doesn't play well with those who already have amyloidosis.
Of the 101 vaccines for which adverse events occurred after vaccination, only a handful reported the occurence of amyloidosis after Covid 'vaccination.' As usual, Covid 'vaccine' patients reported almost all of the cases of the symptom/illness in question.
I know medical fraud is rampant. But we've seen good medical papers retracted (lancet) or denied publication entirely (ivermectin, blood clots etc.) based on the censorship demands of the medical regime in D.C. in regards to the Covid 'shot. This may be a case of trying to detatch documentation from perhaps an upswing in dementia following covid 'vaccination' amyloidosis.
Huge problem in scientific academia! There is no incentive to check papers for the accuracy of their claims. Academics that’s done peer review. It’s clear it isn’t. Peer review often degenerates into a sort of old-boy/girl network horse trading.
Redoing and experiment checking the results ought to be as a minimum a MS thesis for an aspiring BS degree. If the result claimed by the paper is important enough maybe even a PhD dissertation.
In the publish or persistent Academic environment with no incentives to check things this mess is what you get. Estimated that 75% of published papers aren’t reproducible!