ZEEPER FOLLIES PINGLIST!(((PING!)))
The story is factually correct about 85% of the time, but the propaganda and opinions are quite absurd.
The offensive was a bust, yes. The Russians tactics and equipment suck.
But the defense was very costly, albeit not as costly as to the Russians. Eventually, Russia will win, albeit letting its boys die in a 7:1 ratio. I would assume the Russians have some mad mothers ready to march on Moscow at this point. The term “pyrrhic victory” may soon be replaced with “Ukrainian Victory.
Some statements were just stupid. There are no “pro-Russian” lawmakers in Congress. There are lawmakers who (correctly) think the USAs own borders should be strengthened and otherwise have differing priorities than yet another Eastern European quagmire.
May 9th? That’s almost a month ago.
Why don’t you SPAM the board with a little more current news.
Thanks for posting this. David Axe is one of the better pro-Ukraine writers. Often has articles in Forbes as well
Jun 5, 2024
- Western sources claim Russia is using up to 3,000 glide bombs per month;
- Western sources also claim Russia is producing up to 4.5 million rounds per year, more than the collective West will be producing once production expansion targets are achieved in 2-3 years;
- Because both munitions have proven decisive and the collective West is incapable of matching Russian production, it is clear that in this war of attrition Russia has the decisive advantage;
- It should be remembered that according to US policy papers, the goal was never for Ukraine to "win," but simply incur a steep enough cost on Russia to perhaps precipitate a Soviet Union-style collapse, though such a prospect seems more and more remote;
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
