Watch moment sea drones dodge Russian helicopters’ guns as Ukraine launches attack near Putin’s beloved Kerch Bridge

Sun UK ^ | 5/30/2024 | Ellie Doughty

[marcusmaximus]

INCREDIBLE footage shows Ukraine's sea drones nip out of the way of Russian fire during an overnight blitz in occupied Crimea.

Meanwhile Kyiv's forces launched missiles towards Vlad's beloved Kerch Bridge - reportedly sparking some 20 explosions and damaging two ships.

Dramatic video shows the drones flying over water in Uzkaya Bay, western Crimea.

Kyiv's forces dodge the Russian barrage of explosions raining down around them.

The Magura V5 marine drones managed to hit two Russian high speed KS-701 Tunets [Tuna] vessels - despite the onslaught.

The Tuna boats are used by Russian forces for patrolling as well as transport and landing.

On the other side of Crimea in Kerch, Ukraine successfully targeted a car and railway ferry - both used in Vlad's illegal war to supply Crimea from Russia.

Ukrainian intelligence said: “In order to neutralise the attack sea drones....Russian occupiers in Crimea scrambled military aircraft 32 times."

Their failed attempt included multiple warplanes, helicopters and 30 mm cannons.

[JonPreston]

Look 👀 up the definition of Neocon. Your picture will be staring back at you. Now once again, give us an example of any Neocon military victory.

[wastedyears]

Any day now, Ukraine will be marching on the Kremlin. Any day now...

[wastedyears]

And there’s no pro-Ukraine propaganda on the TV, right? You have zero problem with vehemently supporting the same country that so many communists so. Pelosi, Soros, Clinton, Schumer, every single big name democrat in both houses of congress, Klaus Schwab too. Have you ever taken a step back and thought, “am I supporting the right side?”

If your answer is no, then you might be more comfortable watching The Young Turks and browsing Daily Kos.

[wastedyears]

Did we “win” in Afghanistan or Iraq? How about Vietnam or Korea? Panama or Mogadishu? Why does the US military have a presence in nearly every country on the planet?

[McGruff]

Ukraine must be winning then. No more billions of my tax dollars for them.

[adorno]

Winning in Iraq or Afghanistan or Vietnam or elsewhere, is not the final goal.

The final goal is to stop or inhibit bigger and more damaging wars from being instigated or started or waged.

We have not seen a world war for more than 80 years, and it’s not because of the UN. The U.S. has become the policeman of the world, and as such, a presence of that policeman is required in just about every part of the world. If not for that policeman, the many parts of the world would be ruled by tyrants who could have easily taken over their neighbors. China would have easily taken over many countries in Asia and Russia/USSR could easily have become the ruler of most of Europe, and Iran could have become the ruler of the Islamic State Of The Middle East, with Israel having been erased from existence.

We don’t need to win wars, and winning is not about raising flags over lands or territories or conquered countries.

[adorno]

The word ‘neocon’ is the preferred word by those that can’t argue their points with coherent arguments, and it’s become the same kind of word that race-mongers use to try to stop the opposition from making real oppositional arguments. Though not meaning the same, race and neocon are equivalent to trying to win arguments with totally incongruent and asinine wording.

So, you are a ‘neoconista’, which is the same as a dumb-argument-monger.

[bimboeruption]

>>>>That slimy, little worm probably sleeps and takes showers in his little, green outfit?>>>>

I've seen the slimy, little worm without his little, green outfit when he runs naked through grocery stores, plays the piano with his johnson and squirms around like this:

[Allegra]

Jim has asked you Bidenistas to stop doing that, but here you are calling an American conservative a “Putinista.” Don’t you have any respect for the owner of this site?

“We are conservatives. Be respectful to your debate adversary (fellow FReeper). For example, do not accuse them of being a ‘Putinista,’ ‘comrade,’ ‘murderer,’ ‘baby-killer,’ etc, just because he may have a difference of opinion whether or not the US government should be involved in a controversial foreign war where we were not attacked.” -Jim Robinson

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4166577/posts

[bimboeruption]

>>>>Have you ever taken a step back and thought, “am I supporting the right side?”<<<<

The zeeper side...

[ANKE69]

🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮

He is a disgusting pig. 🐷

[tennmountainman]

Freeper Zeepers are a good laugh.

[tennmountainman]

Crimea in 2 Days.

[wastedyears]

So you like your style of bit government.

[tennmountainman]

LOL. I always get a good laugh watching that Gay Actor/President
Scooting on the floor.

[adorno]

We are conservatives.

As a conservative myself, I remember that we were on the side of those that were not communists or that did not support communism. Russia may not be the same as the old USSR, and not entirely the same as the old communists. But, Russia remains the aggressive country they were in the past, and moving in with an invasion of its neighbor(s) is aggression. As a conservative, I cannot approve or condone Russia's actions against any of its neighbors. Though Biden is the one at the moment lending support to Ukraine, I'm pretty sure that even Trump would be lending our support to Ukraine. I'm the complete opposite of Biden, and would never support anything coming from his administration, but I do support the fight by Ukraine against its aggressive neighbor.

Being conservative does not mean that I or any of us are correct in every issue that comes our way where the 'enemy' is democrat or democrat-like. I fought alongside democrats in Vietnam, and I didn't care what their political views were. I don't care about political views, as long as we are on the right side of the issue. Supporting Biden is the wrong side of the issue, but, there are times when it's not just about opposing him on everything. I support Ukraine, and the U.S. is the only ally that can do that right now. So, even some republicans are on the side of Putin, which to me, is a complete embarrassment and against the principles that make us conservatives.

Sorry if people feel 'attacked' but, I'm just being a complete conservative as I understand conservatism.

BTW, I noticed that my posting history has been removed as of 2 days ago, so, is that the way that the conservative FR treats people that might have opposing opinions by fellow FReepers? Freedom of speech apparently has its limits within conservatives sites too.

[adorno]

What’s ‘bit’ government? is that the opposite of ‘big’ government?

I like itty-bitty government. ;)

[doorgunner69]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

[adorno]

Jim has asked you Bidenistas to stop doing that, but here you are calling an American conservative a “Putinista.”

Isn't that being hypocritical? Calling fellow conservatives "Bidenistas".

"Don't do unto others what you don't want them to do unto you".

[Allegra]

I’m doing it unto you because getting a taste of your own nasty medicine is likely the only way you’ll see the error of your ways. And even that is being a tad optimistic on my part.