I have more of a scientific background than you for sure. 8 years working high powered long range communications for the AF, degrees from NATS in electrical engineering and 30+ years working in RF, Propagation, antennas for an applied research institute. Even taught antennas and propagation for a while.
That’s why it’s so difficult to discuss things like this with people that latch on so some weird event and label it as some conspiracy technology based on some misnomer gobbledygook words and think it real. I already gave you a few possible reasons for weather reactions like that and they just blew right past you like a fine howdy doo...
You certainly do have more of a scientific background than I do. I’m sorry if it seems that I am discounting the value of that. One of the really bad things about having a government that constantly lies to us - including the “experts” like the CDC, NIH, etc - is that being an expert doesn’t necessarily mean anything any more, because experts can be accurate or experts can lie their asses off for an agenda. And we the people have no way to know who is who, aside from whatever we can piece together on our own to try to let the science speak for itself. That’s what I’m trying to do.
I did some looking on my own and find that weather patterns can be in a holding pattern if the jetstream is really reduced and/or divides. I don’t know what that would look like on radar. I tried to find other examples of radar with this kind of wall effect, to see if there were examples showing that what you said does cause the same observable phenomenon on radar but I wasn’t able to find that. If you know how I can find that I would greatly appreciate it.
This hasn’t gotten into any of the HAARP stuff and I haven’t been able to find a clear description of how Dutchsinse says the NEXRAD stuff works. I’ve seen talk about plasma being created but haven’t been able to figure out what he’s saying. I also don’t know what difference the ionization is supposed to make, as opposed to excitation that can be caused by even non-ionizing radiation.
In the past I’ve seen people similar to yourself who have argued that earthquakes cannot be created. But Raytheon whistleblower Erick Hecker says he heard from the people who actually tried their earthquake maker in Iceland the first time, telling him in real time that they accidentally hit New Zealand by mistake.
He’s also said stuff about Havana Syndrome, which is finally now being acknowledged. What he’s saying is that the technology is able to target specific individuals who already have everything about them known (as per 5th Generation Warfare tactics), and create that person’s own voice in their own head saying whatever the programmer says.
There have been questions of whether Directed Energy could have been used to create massive fires such as the fire in Hawaii. What would stop a massive microwave attack from scorching any area it could reach?
Directed Energy Weapons are not just about shooting down drones or missiles. Energy can be directed to do all kinds of things. But the information is on a “need to know” basis, so a lot of people who are experts about any one area of expertise STILL can get it wrong simply because they haven’t been read into the programs.
That’s no offense to those who haven’t been read in. They are probably spreading information to the best of their knowledge. But that doesn’t change the hidden programs and the Deep State/cabal crooks who use them.
I do wonder, though, when somebody claims that a particular technology is absolutely impossible. Hecker described the use of quantum entanglement - where a particle light-years away can be instantaneously impacted by action here on earth. Who would ever have said that would be possible even a decade ago?
The US government is expert at hiding its own crimes. So it is particularly interesting that they claim that radar and other sources of electromagnetic radiation can modify weather. To what do you think they are referring?
This world is really messed up, and finding out the genuine truth is harder now than it’s ever been. That necessarily makes discussions like this contentious. I hate it that it is this way but it is what it is.
The beauty of a conspiracy theory is that if someone presents facts to contradict or disprove it, you get to just make up another conspiracy to rationalize it. They eventually end up with assertions that the all-powerful Gubmint is in on it, knows all about, and is covering it all up.