“A causal fallacy is one that implies a relationship between two things where one can’t actually be proven.”
A perfect example of your posts relating to your boy Dutch!
I have actually said nothing about causation. I have asked questions. I have gotten no answers.
And you are STILL using red herrings - anything you can bring up EXCEPT the two pieces of evidence I specifically asked about:
1) Federal law requiring electromagnetic weather modification to be reported
2) the cone-shaped blips on the radar
I’ve also asked about a theory - specifically , what effect time reversal would have on radar capability. Again, nobody has addressed that question.
I’ll just bring up one thing from the link where physicists were addressing the question of whether radar can ionize. One poster had worked on military projects and said basically that based on what he already knows he’s not gonna argue the theoreticals about it. The strong implication was that he isn’t interested in discussing how it works because he already knows that it does. The Soviets have been waiting around for the last 80 or so years, waiting to see when or if we were ever gonna figure out this reversed time phenomenon.