Having returned to read the thread, thank you for the interest in the information posted.
“Angels Don’t Play This HAARP” was written 30 years ago by Dr. Nick Begich, a physicist, who is one of the sons of an Alaskan state legislator killed in a plane crash in, I believe, the 70s. His brother is also a politician.
It references the antenna array built in Gakona, Alaska, and the purposes for which it was built - weather warfare conducted by weather modification. Includes the original patent information and the involvement of the US military and the Raytheon corporation, among others. Fascinating.
The book is out of print, but searching should turn up a copy. There are many HAARPs now, the last time I looked some years back, Australia had two, Norway had one or two. Who knows how many have Russia, India, and China. It is warfare, conducted by weather manipulation. Very handy to be able to rain out ball games, ensure sunny days for Royal weddings, destroy crops, create localized floods, etc.
The poster ragging you re fracking is obviously a long-time monitor of the work of Dutchsinse. This information is worth noting.
The older Begich who died (was killed?) was Alaska’s sole representative in the US House at the time.
“Dr. Nick Begich, a physicist”
You really should not quote Coast to Coast AM!
The loudest noise-makers here are not serious scientists as they claim. They fall prey to every logical fallacy in the book.
The one that bugs me the most is the appeal to authority. Evidence doesn’t count if it is posted on the internet.
That, of course, is followed by circular reasoning. Well, it would count if it linked to some real (authority-based) evidence but it links to something on the internet so it still doesn’t count.
I’m not expressing myself well; the trolling has its desired effect of tiring out the target. I’m not even going to reply to the posts where what I’ve previously posted is badly butchered as if the responder’s reading comprehension is about a 5-year-old’s. But the underlying epistemology of these supposed “scientists” is exactly the kind of undermining that has gone on in 5th-generation warfare, to dumb us all down to a point where we can’t have any kind of decent conversation. The reasoning here is the same kind of reasoning that the woke left uses. There’s no way to reason with somebody who blows off any inquiry of phenomena they blow off as “conspiratorial”.
Ask a simple question like “Hey, what’s causing those weird cone-shaped blips on the radar screen” and you get canceled for being crazy. You saw it right here on Free Republic in full view of everybody.
God help us. There’s no way to fix the stupid. The logical fallacies have taken over the world.
“The poster ragging you re fracking is obviously a long-time monitor of the work of Dutchsinse.”
Nope. Butter introduced that faker to me.
“Dr. Nick Begich, a physicist”
Please cite his doctoral thesis ...