Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Condos will be a lot cheaper.
1 posted on 05/16/2024 2:48:21 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dynachrome

It’s difficult to beat a Mule and 40 acres.....


2 posted on 05/16/2024 2:49:56 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Walk away and take the hit.


3 posted on 05/16/2024 2:51:03 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Hoping-to-Escape-Special-Assessments-Listing-Soar
exxon station near my location

4 posted on 05/16/2024 2:51:07 PM PDT by dynachrome ("God grant I don't outlive my wits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Not only are insurance rates soaring, but owners are hit with huge special assessments topping $100,000.
_______________________

It’s all to ensure your safety. The government is always concerned with your safety.


5 posted on 05/16/2024 2:53:36 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

They are, I can tell you that.

And many of them, like ours, for example, couldn’t be further in terms of structural risk than the tragic one that kicked off this knee-jerk legislative reaction that was, undoubtedly, demanded by our elected representatives’ paymasters in the insurance lobby.

In the long run, however, some buildings will be better; condo boards (as we have learned the hard way) are textbook examples of everything that’s wrong with committees and “fiduciaries.”

But don’t me started.

We’re living it, but, God willing, we’ll survive, and our buildings will be worth that much more when done.


10 posted on 05/16/2024 3:18:13 PM PDT by xoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

two words: due diligence ...


14 posted on 05/16/2024 3:24:33 PM PDT by catnipman (A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
State law previously allowed condos to waive reserve funding year after year, leading many buildings, including the nearly 50-year-old Cricket Club, to keep next to nothing in their coffers.

I’m really surprised that a state law would allow such a thing. In my state a condo association is required by law to keep a fully funded reserve in place.

16 posted on 05/16/2024 3:26:14 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

In the past, the Condo HOA could put to a vote of the owners if they wanted to do maintenance on major items, and most voted no, which created the issue. The new law states that 1) HOA must have reserves to cover the cost of maintenance and major known issues and 2) the HOA must pay a 3rd party to assess the complex, identify and assign costs to the major issues, and provide a timeline of when they must be fixed before they become critical. This means that most HOAs must collect millions in reserves. It is not that the condos will become cheap, it is that they will become unsellable. You will not be able to get financing or insurance on them if the HOA does not have the adequate reserves. It will become cheaper to write the building off and demolish it and start over, than to fix a lot of buildings. I would not buy some of them if they were free.


17 posted on 05/16/2024 3:27:59 PM PDT by RainMan ((Democrats ... making war against America since April 12, 1861))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

My brother sold his condo in central Florida a couple of months ago. He was on the board for his association. He predicted this to me some time back. Also, this has created huge liability problems for condo association board members. He said it is now very unwise to be on a condo board. What will the associations do when no one will do that job?

This is a long way from bottom.


30 posted on 05/16/2024 3:48:43 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ("If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

They cheated out and neglected the structures for decades. Time to pay the piper.


38 posted on 05/16/2024 4:00:27 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

I suspect excessive moisture and reinforced concrete can be a problematic mixture.

The reinforced concrete could weaken from ground water, roof water or plumbing leak water.


49 posted on 05/16/2024 5:34:29 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

A 2018 inspection performed by the engineering firm Morabito Consultants pointed out a “major error” in the construction of the pool deck, whereby the waterproofing layer was not sloped. Rainwater that collected on the waterproofing therefore remained until it could evaporate. Over the years, the concrete slabs below the pool deck had been severely damaged by this water. The report noted the waterproofing below the pool deck was beyond its useful life and needed to be completely removed and replaced. The firm wrote that “failure to replace waterproofing in the near future will cause the extent of the concrete deterioration to expand exponentially”, and that the repair would be “extremely expensive”. The ceiling slabs of the parking garage, which sat below the pool deck, showed several sizable cracks and cases of exposed reinforcing bar or rebar from spalling.

In October 2020, initial repairs around the pool could not be completed because (according to engineers) the deterioration had penetrated so deeply that repairs would have risked destabilizing that area.

On April 9, 2021, a letter to residents had outlined a $15-million remedial-works program, noting that concrete deterioration was accelerating and had become “much worse” since the 2018 report. Although the roof repairs pursuant to the consultant’s report were underway at the time of the collapse, remedial concrete works had not yet begun.

more at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfside_condominium_collapse


50 posted on 05/16/2024 5:43:40 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

“Condos will be a lot cheaper.”

Sign on I-95 just entering FL from GA:

Florida condos 50% off.


51 posted on 05/16/2024 6:28:08 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
But what a view!


54 posted on 05/16/2024 7:39:16 PM PDT by moovova ("The NEXT ELECTION is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Condo Boards are supposed to maintain an ongoing repair and replacement reserve supported by facilities audits of fixed assets. Going to be some lawsuits coming out of this.


66 posted on 05/17/2024 1:54:35 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dreams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Florida sucks. Its hot,flat, and way overcrowded. There are some nice places, but still way overcrowded.


71 posted on 05/17/2024 3:26:17 AM PDT by Thomas Jerome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

The best thing a condo HOA could do is require 100% owner occupancy. Remove all investor owned units.


73 posted on 05/17/2024 4:42:58 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson