Mike Rogers over Justin Amash, I'm with you there. But only slightly, because I'm not sure that either are a help, although Mike Rogers might be slightly better than Justin Amash.
You are dead wrong on McCarthy though BillyBoy. I tried hard to give Mike Johnson the benefit of the doubt, however, I no longer can stand firmly in his defense.
Here's why both Mike's give me pause for cause:
If Trump is reelected to the White House, I could see both voting with the Democrats to stop him from taking the presidency, because both of them are operationally stupid timid individuals who place party over the people's choice, and the party is not the Republican Party. That only exists within the Freedom Caucus. The party they will stand with is the Uni-party.
>> Amash voted to impeach Trump. That alone should disqualify him from any consideration even for a job cleaning portable toilets with a toothbrush. If Amash was the GOP nominee for an office in my state or district, I’d write in Harvey Weinstein’s name before I ever vote for that @sshole. <<
Bingo. Rogers has his flaws and is FAR from perfect, but any GOP voter can compare Rogers to Amash on topics like the standing up to the LGBTQ mafia, protecting the unborn, opposing the Islamofacists crying about how "oppressed" they are because they "only" control 99.7% of the middle east, and not voting for frivolous, baseless impeachments because you utterly loathe someone named "Donald", and realize that Amash is well to the LEFT of Rogers.
Any "conservative" who has looked at BOTH their records honestly and still thinks Trump's endorse is "Horrible" is not saying much about Trump's own track but their twisted idea of what "conservative" means. It reminds me when some cartoonist wanted to point out how "bad" Stephen Hawking's beliefs about Israel were, and his editorial showing all the "good" things about Israel gloated about the fact they had one of the largest pro-sodomy "pride" parades in the world. That said more about what the cartoonist thinks is "good" in his twisted mind, than it did about how "bad" Stephen Hawking's views were.
Furthermore, Rand Paul and his FReeper fan of the same name CONSTANTLY crying about Mike Rogers having an "anti-Trump" record, while trying to ignore/cover up their OWN candidate Justin Amash's anti-Trump being 10X WORSE is incredibly laughable and hypocritical. Ironically, Rand poked fun at the Liz Cheney cheerleaders screaming about "carpetbagging" politicians being "out of touch" while simultaneously cheering on Liz Cheney carpetbagging into Wyoming when she hadn't lived the since she was 12. I guess Rand now wants to take a page from their own glass house tactics. Et tu, Rand?
“...RINOs are nothing more than Democrats and both are what make up the Uni-party, which is a product of the Deep-State.”
Most excellent summation, I’m looking forward to voting AGAINST Amash for the third time this August. I’m a proud basher of the GOPe as there has been no republican party for a long time - segue this into why my I’m NOT voting for my “conservative” (once upon a time) Walberg either who has been largely labelled a firm (R) for a long time. Not anymore, he voted for the $1.2 trillion omnibus (no money for the border but cash for the tranny crowd) along with FISA spy mess, and of course countless billions for the Ukes. Never.
There is another dynamic going on too but the MSM and the uniparty/dems/GOPe won’t ever mention it, take for example why Michigan lost both the state house and the state senate at the same time for the first time in decades in the last election, why is this?
Largely because the red areas in this state are really red like other states and just don’t turn out to support RINOs/uniparty types when one can’t tell the difference. It’s been happening around the country, best example recently is the “red wave” that never materialized.