Transformers, on a highly-simplified basis, predict the next word to type based on the prompt, and prior typed words, based on a training dataset.
I am searching for which underlying document calls Friedman “rigid” and his ideas “oversimplify.”
This is interesting material.
Thanks for posting it.
IMO the ai has improved a lot over the past 4-6 months. I went from never using it to always using it over a traditional search. Plus, recently it even returned material from this site re: Samsel’s recording being leaked. I was astonished at both it using this site as a reference given the shunning pf right wing sites and the material was only on this site for 3hrs and yet it picked it up anyway.
My own two cents-
creativity, imagination and curiosity plus wealth equals innovation.
Of note, since the Euros have installed the VAT tax, the amount of innovation has plummeted. They are taking ard 40% of gdp annually vs ard 15% here. Likewise, the totalitarian states whether they are islamic republics or the usual suspects often innovate militarily and little else.
Also, the govt growing in good times and even more in bad times while the private sector obv contracts in recessions can only lead to an abominable size govt such as ours.
Clever indeed. This is why I believe AI will become the anti-Christ.
It's just a matter of choosing the most creative of the AI systems available to carry forth that role in the most impressive manner.
I’ve been using Claude 3 Opus as an assistant to write and analyze screenplays. I passed the entire 110-page script, and it returned a very detailed treatment including plot synopsis, character analysis, and areas that need more development. Sometimes, it doesn’t see a nuance in the script, and when I explain it, it often apologizes and corrects itself, saying that it sees my point. When I asked it to identify the philosophical conflict in the script, it provided insights that I would not have seen. I then had it generate a scene with dialog that made this conflict clearer and it wrote a very credible bit of dialog.
The real test was when I had a scene between two characters and I wanted it to use innuendo subtext for humor. I gave an example from Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity between Nash and Phyllis on the staircase. It understood the subtext and wrote a very funny scene that, with some editing, worked well.
I don’t know if Claude is self-aware but it doesn’t matter. I can work with it like a human and it has demonstrated numerous times that it is smarter than I am.
send a copy to this POS...
Awkward moment Biden’s economic adviser Jared Bernstein admits he can’t explain how money works
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4235555/posts
Have you asked it about it’s own future profitability?
My two cents:
Similar to the advent and proliferation of the plain Jane computer chip-it will improve the lives of every man, woman and child on earth.
However, also similarly, it is mostly a commodity with the low cost providers winning in the end.
But I also engaged it in analysis of Genesis 3, of tactics of the devil, and how it relates to political rulers.
* I wrote to the sources to tell them what I did, since I wanted to obey the rules, but in these two cases I presumed permission after I receiving no reply, for it seemed too important for a Christian source to restrict to watching a video, but which I clearly linked to with source attribution. Now YouTube transcripts seem to be hard to find anymore.
Very informative.