2. Boeing aircraft built before Airbus existed are included
3. The NTSB data does not include all Airbus data
4. Cargo and charter aircraft flying are included
Another flaw is that there are more Airbus aircraft operating in Europe than the United States, but there is no single source of incident data for Europe like we have with the NTSB in the United States.
If you are a Boeing Whistleblower, it may be unsafe....
“Does data show Boeing is unsafe?”
If you’re on the ground, you’re likely safe, if you’re in the air...(you decide).
Spreading fear is the core of our society these days. The government can easily rule over frightened people.
I put the wrong source. It's not Aviation Week. It is Aviation's Week in Charts, Visual Approach; a mesh of aviation and data science.
I found it on this X Thread with some interesting discussion. If this is interesting to you, you might give a follow to KC-10 Driver.
Whole thing is beyond stupid:
1. the two max crashes - Boeing or pilot training/error? Both contributed.
2. 9/11? Hardley Boeings fault
3. American A300 out of JFK? Pilot error/training? Probably.
4. Lost Malaysian 777?
5. 777 shot down by the Russians?
6. Sully on the Hudson? Airbus did not manufacture the engines.
7. TWA 747? maybe Boeing. This was probably their biggest failure, although I know a lot of you nuts think it was a missile.
If not, why are they killing off their whistle blowers?
How many Boeing incidents are bad design/build and how many are bad airline maintenace/pilot error?
It seems to me Boeing gets painted with the airline’s brush (not that they don’t have problems of their own)