Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

A truly fascinating article. Americans should read it. "Follow the science" has become a political phrase to shut up debate. THAT is the antithesis of science.
1 posted on 04/17/2024 8:20:43 PM PDT by Beave Meister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Beave Meister

Ronald Reagan Starwars


2 posted on 04/17/2024 8:27:28 PM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

“Misinformation” is the left’s word for anything that contradicts left-wing nostrums for whatever ails the country.


3 posted on 04/17/2024 8:27:48 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

Notice the idiot who wrote this article fails to mention that the only ballistic missile defense tests that worked were the ones where the mock missile had a homing tracker built into it, in other words ABM can only work if you literally cheat!


5 posted on 04/17/2024 9:06:17 PM PDT by pigeoninthepark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

Back in the 1980s the liberal creeps mocked Ronald Reagan. Reagan knew back then that American ingenuity would eventually be able to defend against missiles and ICBMs. The libs said that “hitting a bullet with another bullet” was a pipe dream. They dubbed it Star Wars, unobtainable.

Well, American ingenuity combined with Israeli ingenuity, just intercepted at least 300 missiles and drones from Iran. None of them breached Israeli airspace. Even Jordan helped Israel.

Israel calls the different anti-missle systems Iron Dome (Patriot) , David’s Sling, and Arrow.

Ronald Reagan is smiling down on us.


6 posted on 04/17/2024 10:13:48 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister
The only legit arguments against it were:

1. Breaking from the Ballistic Missile Treaty.

2. Cost

It always made sense in that it was technically possible already many years ago (Sprint, Nike Hercules, Hawk TBM), it's a true defensive measure, and there has been a growing threat for a long-long time. Already in 1991 with the older version of the Patriot the real world practical application of this was put to test in Desert Shield / Storm when shooting down SCUD missiles.

The people that claimed they had some engineering / science argument against it, made no sense.

If anything, it was reckless and irresponsible (sorry for the cliche, but true in this case) not to pour needed resources into missile defense and slow roll it as we did for many years.

7 posted on 04/17/2024 11:55:23 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

A policy that Biden/0bama is following by cutting missile defense by $400 billion.


9 posted on 04/18/2024 5:20:50 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson