Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 04/01/2024 Vol.490, Q Day 2347, stylin19a wrote:
good grief.. this really needs to stop...preponderance of evidence coming up...

extended version of meeting...no greenscreens...how many more do i need to come up with ? Different angles
CSpan extended video of the Event. No Green Screens

a getty image No Green Screens

and more stuff...no green screens in sight

No Green Screens and plausible explanation for eyes playing tricks on you

please...make it stop.
Can't credibly attack or shake the facts with facts of your own, so attack the messengers and provide a conspiracy lie as gospel. .
We generally are asked to bring the sauce...I have. Where's yours ?

have at it - bust it up.
CSPAN, GETTY, AP? That image you posted is an AP photo used in an article in Politico. I refuse to bow to their FAKE NEWS' expertise.' I thought once the Q movement exposed the treasonous concerted lying of the Mockingbird press for about 7 years, anyone familiar with this thread wouldn't dream of demanding deference to the FAKE NEWS MSM anymore.
My eyes are not playing tricks on me; that's just a tactic the CIA/MSM uses to undermine our trust in ourselves.
I trust my own eyes more than I trust the Mockingbird Press. The same mockingbird press claims that anyone in the Q movement is deluded, dangerous, a threat to democracy, and extremist etc., and that Trump tried to overthrow the country on Jan 6. They smoothly pivot from trying to get Trump convicted for treason, a capital offense, long enough to say my eyes are playing tricks on me? The nerve of those keyboad animals!
You don't offer a 'preponderance of evidence'. With marked exasperation/indignation, you offer a wall of MSM (WAPO, GETTY, CSPAN and a UFO 'debunker') and then chide/scold. It's as if I'm being scolded to go back to relying on the 'experts' in the MSM (get back in the fold) and just not trust my own eyes. Why should I simply ignore articles by more trustworthy publications like 'American Thinker' just because MSM deploys the 'conspiracy' label?
The media did a lousy job of making some kind of composite video and then when it's called out, they went back and made a clean(er) version, distributed it, and from there, it's GAME ON - ridicule anyone trusting their own eyes.
If you ask 'please, make it stop,' well then just stop it.

I’m with ransomnote. Piling on.

This is a fake video.

No way do I believe the word of one MSM “journalist” who claims he was there.

... but I do think there are a few other possible explanations.

1. DS made a fake video to convince us that it was really JB and he was really at the WH talking with reporters. (my top pick, and what rn has been saying with excellent evidence)

2. DS made a real video and altered it to look fake in order to trap Anons. (possible, but unlikely IMO. I don’t think the DS can think that far ahead. )

3. Patriots made the fake video ( to give us some evidence ). ( Good possibility. )

4. Patriots made a real video and made it look fake. (Not sure why they might do such a thing, so very low on my list of possibilities.)

Probably a few other explanation that have not occurred to me, but I think #1 is the overwhelming favorite, with #2 & #3 as distant runners-up.

When I consider what did or could have happened in any scenario, I have to ask myself what the motivation might be, and how do the people involved behave. Are the actors logical? Rational? Patriotic? Crazy? Evil? Thinking 5 steps ahead? Reacting with knee-jerk emotions? Panicked? Covering up something? Speaking to anons? Speaking to their base ? Speaking to some particular group? ........