The idea is that life is spontaneous - no Creator - and that as long as the right conditions are present, things just start living. They will find that making things live is not that simple.
The original mission of our current set of rovers was to find evidence of life on Mars and so far, nothing.
This vast investment of our money is to validate their atheism, not so much science.
If ‘life’ were so easily generated, by accident even, then the scientists could deliberately do it in a controlled laboratory situation.
It isn’t. They can’t. God laughs.................
The original mission of our current set of rovers was to find evidence of life on Mars and so far, nothing
—
was released to the public. One of the early Mars Rovers found a sea anemone like formation, but after the photo was taken, the formation was ground off to see what was under it, with no further comment.
Do not trust that NASA is telling the truth about anything. Just look at the hundreds of destroyed Apollo Mission photos or the mislabeling of the existing ones
A deep dive into the subject of abiogenesis reveals that the odds of life appearing spontaneously are beyond astronomical. The chance of a single smino acid forming accidentally is on the order of 10E164. More than all the atoms in the observable universe. But you need several different amino structure and they have to be inside a membrane for this to work at all.
Oh and don’t forget that the sea of chemicals these things are supposed to self assemble in has to be free of other impurities... Something that can only occur in a lab.
This is all discounting that the universe, unless acted upon by life tends to disorganization.
However, the solar winds have been blowing Earth microbes into space for billions of years. These have impacted Mars and all the outer planets for all that time. So finding evidence of life on Mars is not that unlikely. It had a decent environment a long time ago.