Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
Step aside? She should be arrested.
That's mighty white of him.
Oh my, if Fani has lost MSNBC...
It doesn’t matter for the substance, but it sure matters for the politics. Amazing that the democrats don’t see how disastrous her corrupt behavior has been for their case.
It’s funny watching Fanny saying she doesn’t want to immaculate a black man, then telling the world her lover can’t get it up and her lovers law firm partner sexually assaulted a male employee.
It worse than a soap opera!
I am sure she will be forced to step aside as a distraction to protect the hoax investigation and trial so it can be continued.
“We have had a dishonest prosecutor conducting an honest investigation.”
We have one witness who has testified that the relationship started BEFORE Wade joined the DA's Office. That would be Ms Yeartie, former Willis best friend, former employee of the DA's Office, and owner of the Hapeville condo that Willis and Wade met in. Another witness may be forthcoming. That would be Mr. Bradley, de facto law partner of Mr. Wade, who was previous restrained from testifying as to this matter by attorney-client privilege resulting from serving as Mr. Wade's divorce atty. The Judge is making a determination as to whether or not Bradley misinterpreted his problems testifying because of such privilege.
The second and biggest problem is that Willis claims she paid for her vacations with Wade with cash. She and Wade both admit that there is no evidence of such payments. No bank withdrawals by Willis, no bank deposits by Wade, no signed hand written receipt by Wade to Willis spelling out the amount, the date, or the purpose.
As an aside, all gifts over $100 received by Willis are supposed to be reported (to the State?) and Willis reported none re: the vacations. These vacations look like gifts unless Willis got receipts as evidence for her reimbursements to Wade. She didn't bother with that detail.
They are allowed to lie and perjure themselves in order to convict their targets.
-PJ
Fact is…. They have proved she financially benefited. They produced credit card statements. She alleges that she refunded him in cash. There is zero evidence that happened. He didn’t even deposit the cash. Zero evidence except credit card statements. They have proved the allegations.
It seems that there was a lot of evidence that was being given to the judge showing that the affair began before Wade was hired by Willis. The judge has to decide if it is to remain confidential. The Trump team seemed to try to get as much of it on the record as possible, and suggested that if the other side had conspired to defraud the court, they would lose attorney client privilege. When the Willis team threw Wade’s divorce attorney under the bus, I believe they may have created an enemy with all the goods on them, and nothing to lose.
Love you and your work, you're good egg.
But under no circumstances would I ever view a video of those psychopaths.