And if they had objected they'd be cancelled.
“Harvard’s governing board, concluding that Gay’s “conduct was not reckless nor intentional “
nope, I guess she just unintentionally used other people’s work while choosing to not give them proper credit.
Well, she will still make nearly half a million a year because they will lack the intestinal fortitude to do the right thing and fire her.
Imagine if she was Trump: “TRUMP PROVED CHEATER”
Harvard hired somebody to meet the corrections for Claudine Gay's articles.
“Gay’s “conduct was not reckless nor intentional and, therefore, did not constitute research misconduct.””
No, her word processor is to blame for changing her original content into verbatim (or near verbatim) copies of the work of other authors/researchers.
If you say otherwise, you are a racist and a sexist.
Plus you probably went to a community college or a low-ranked state university and not Haaavard.
Was everything in proportional font?
Any future charge of student plagiarism is void. It no longer exists at Harvard.
Or, there gonna be some big lawsuits brought forward, and they would win easily.
Goose meet gander.
Meanwhile, across the Charles River.....
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4212178/posts
The very concept of meritocracy has been shredded in Boston.
That’s Gay!
Bfl
So many different ways of saying “stolen”, their thesaurus must be plumb worn out.
Good job talented committee writer, you should clearly be given the Harvard president position.
And yet she’s still employed and making $900,000 a year.
Must be nice.
L