There is no rational basis for you to claim the founders "declined to identify and to describe the term" or even that there was a need to do so. It is certain they were confident of their usage of the term, that it was well understood at the time at least by those who would sign the document and thought appropriate.
However, this would be a good time for you to explain why you believe they seemed to purposely obscure the meaning of the term since you claim to know.
As for the rest of your response you mistakenly confuse me for an anti-Nikki voter and charge me and others for grandstanding on the NBC issue only because we are racists.
With that, I am going to do things more enjoyable than exchanging with you.
You claim the founders were certain and confident of their usage. Yet here we are - 237 years later and legal experts, courts, historians and millions others are on both sides of the fence on this NBC issue. I tell you again. This was by design. They left it up to Congress to interpret what is and isn't a NBC
As we know Congress has tried to do this as well as the Courts. They have failed.
However, this would be a good time for you to explain why you believe they seemed to purposely obscure the meaning of the term since you claim to know.
With that, I am going to do things more enjoyable than exchanging with you.
Good Day Sir.