Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Donald Trump should ask the following direct question to Nikki Haley, directly or via the mainstream media, and insist on a direct answer to this question: "Are you now or have you ever been at or by your birth a Citizen of two or more countries? And if so, which countries?" She must answer that question specifically and fully to the public via the mainstream media so the American electorate can know all the facts regarding dual-citizenship and dual-allegiance required by law for dual-citizens.The answer to that question is a national security concern when one is considering who can be the Commander in Chief of our military. We do not need another President and Commander in Chief born with dual-citizenship and allegiances, and thus divided loyalties. Look what Obama did to this country already and him and "Team Obama" is still doing in his 3rd term, i.e., as Biden's puppet-master. It's a case of full transparency needs to be demanded of those seeking the highest national office(s) so American electorate does not repeat the same errors all over again, i.e., like they did with Obama and Harris due to that question not directly asked and the ramifications of the answer not being fully discussed in the mainstream media and/or in the national debates. See this article for more on the importance of transparency when it comes to national security concerns in today's USA, especially for those seeking high political office: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2023/05/07/transparency-requirements-for-candidates-for-president-and-vice-president-more-is-needed-in-our-modern-electoral-process-filing-the-oge-financial-disclosure-form-278e-is-mandatory-the-opm-na/
1 posted on 01/19/2024 4:57:37 PM PST by CDR Kerchner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CDR Kerchner

That did not stop obozo.


2 posted on 01/19/2024 4:59:05 PM PST by oldasrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner
Here we go again. :)

I think this is a dead issue. I agree with your position, but the courts are idiots and do not care what the truth is.

Discussing this topic will have no real world impact.

They are going to do it anyway.

3 posted on 01/19/2024 5:00:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

So funny to see Trump, Trump supporters, and the media first use Ramaswamy, then Haley to wedge out DeSantis, then as she is poised to beat Trump in New Hampshire because of open voting by non-Republicans, they now raise the obvious issue many of us have raised since day one, Ramaswamy and Haley are not eligible. Guess everyone is now done with useful tool Haley, so time to dump her quickly. Consider even Gov Sununu trashed her earlier today after saying she could win, having endorsed, now says she could never win, maybe could manage second place in New Hampshire, etc. So transparent.


4 posted on 01/19/2024 5:03:03 PM PST by Reno89519 (It's war. No one murders and takes Americans hostage. Time to act. Declare war on Islamic Hamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner
So where was your constitutional citing, outrage when Bobby Jindal ran in his primary?

Paul Ingrassia is nothing more than a writer who is making his own interpretation of the "Natural Born Citizen" clause in the Constitution.

He ain't going anywhere..........Sheesh!

5 posted on 01/19/2024 5:03:25 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (This Is The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner
Tilting at windmills.

Every one of the early presidents was the child of non-citizens so this is just goofy nativism run amuck. Stop wasting time with bad arguments and share good ones (of which there are plenty) for why people shouldn't vote for Neo-con warmonger Nikki.

6 posted on 01/19/2024 5:03:37 PM PST by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

Whether or not she is eligible is not the correct question. That would have been correct back during the era of the rule of law, but we are beyond that era, into the era of the rule of force.

So the correct question now is: “Even if she is ineligible, who is going to stop her?”


7 posted on 01/19/2024 5:03:50 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

If bloggers or FReepers were in charge this might matter, but they’re not.


11 posted on 01/19/2024 5:06:44 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

seeing something else here. camel’s nose under the tent to a foreign-born future “President” being installed by the powers that be under the guise of the new normality Nikki will be introducing...”The constitution doesn’t really mean what the text seems to say about who can be President”.


15 posted on 01/19/2024 5:07:51 PM PST by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

The Constitution does not allow non-natural born citizens to be President but, like Obama, people allowed it. Obama even produced a fake birth certificate and deleted airline passenger manifests from Kenya. However, raw emotion caused a blind eye to his ineligibility.


27 posted on 01/19/2024 5:24:53 PM PST by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner
I'm sorry, but this is just stupid. "Detailed analysis" aside, the matter comes down to these two questions:

1. Is Nikki Haley a U.S. citizen now? If your answer is "yes," then . . .

2. Did Haley ever undergo an actual "naturalization" process in order to become a citizen?

If the answer to this second question is "no," then Haley is a "natural born citizen" within the meaning of the U.S. Constitution, Article II, all other contortions and distortions aside.

A "natural born citizen" is someone who, by operation of law -- i.e., whatever law was in place at the time of the person's birth -- was a U.S. citizen at birth. That's all "natural born citizen" means, and that's all the term has ever meant. Period. Full stop.

34 posted on 01/19/2024 5:35:45 PM PST by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

Raising concern about Nikki Haley’s eligibility will be used as ammunition to shoot down any effort to fully discuss the question. Their first strike will be to discredit those who do as MAGA extremists belonging in the basket of deplorables. Much of their motivation is they don’t want anything to prevent Nikki Haley from winning the nomination. The Dems see her as easy to defeat after they replace Biden with, who I predict, will be The Mooche.


40 posted on 01/19/2024 5:41:52 PM PST by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

This is BS. My family fled Poland to escape the oppression of Jews. My grandfather was born here in CA. They were all proud to be Americans - and yes, they were Republicans.

My grandfather became famous at something else.....but had he intended to run for POTUS, he could. He was born here. He was a natural born US citizen. My family did not have to wait another generation to have an offspring who was eligible.

All of the first American Presidents were US citizens the day of independence. They were born here. They were not born of “US citizens”. It would be at least two generations before we had a POTUS who was both born here and born to US citizens.

If you don’t like Haley, then don’t vote for her. But she is eligible to run for the office.


56 posted on 01/19/2024 5:58:55 PM PST by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner
No, The Constitution Does Not Allow Children Born Of Non-Citizens To Become President Of The United States 

Not this shit again Spanish | hcanes100 | Flickr

 

NBC kooks just won't admit it" Are you a US citizen? Then yeah. You can become the president.

Birthers are 0-226 on Obama alone.

63 posted on 01/19/2024 6:08:05 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner
"No, The Constitution Does Not Allow Children Born Of Non-Citizens To Become President Of The United States"

If the child is born here, yes it does. Get over it.

84 posted on 01/19/2024 6:49:20 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

BTTT


93 posted on 01/19/2024 7:54:11 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (“Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys” P.J. O’Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

Well:

The Congressional Research Service concluded in 2011:

“The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term ‘natural born’ citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship ‘by birth’ or ‘at birth,’ either by being born ‘in’ the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; The predominant legal scholarship holds that the term natural born citizen applies, quite simply, to anyone who is a U.S. citizen at birth, or by birth, and does not have to go through the naturalization process. The child of parents who are U.S. citizens, regardless of whether he or she is born abroad, fits into the category under most modern interpretations.”

https://www.thoughtco.com/presidents-not-born-in-the-us-3368103


106 posted on 01/19/2024 9:01:27 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

Kristi Noem.

Born in the USA to TWO parents BOTH born in the USA.

All born in Watertown, Codington Co., SD USA


112 posted on 01/20/2024 5:36:25 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CDR Kerchner

Yes we clearly need a USSC definition. They rejected 6 cases on Sotero.

Jay and Washington exchanged a letter expressing their concern about a “foreigner” being commander -in-chief.

We also have Vattel’s definition from 1744 which the founders knew about. A NBC has citizen parents and is born in country.

Here is the logic. If a child born in the US but has foreigners as parents, the child has a choice of citizenship. Using Sotero, his father was British as a Kenya at that time. So Sotero could have declared british or US. Does anyone think the founders would have accepted a Brit as commander in chief, especially after two wars?

The ability to have options about your citizenship means you are not automatically a NBC; thus you are ineligible to be president.

This recently applied to Jindal, Harris, Sotero, and I don’t know about Vivek’s parents.


155 posted on 01/20/2024 8:03:37 PM PST by coalminersson (since )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Ingrassia doesn’t have the guts to initiate legal action regarding this.

It’s easy to write an article claiming what he does.

It takes guts to walk the walk.


192 posted on 01/23/2024 12:36:25 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson