Harvard Professor Naomi Oreskas Condemns Free Speech Platform X as a “Toxic Place” – Davos Colleague Warns Social Media and Speech Need to to Be Controlled

Gateway Pundit ^

[Tench_Coxe]

Harvard Professor Naomi Oreskes condemns free speech on Twitter-X as scary at the annual Davos globalist gathering.

Naomi Oreskes: For a long time I was on Twitter, and now it’s become such a toxic place that I’ve concluded it’s not a worthwhile place to spend time. And as you’ve said, it is exhausting. So you do have to pick and choose and you have to think about where, the places where you can get your message across. But I am trying to figure out, I mean, I have given up on X. What a scary name that even is, right. And I don’t know what the alternative is right now.

[Tench_Coxe]

Because nothing says "rebuilding trust" like getting rid of free speech.....

1. At this rate, at some point names like Harvard will become a dirty word.
2. The WEF uses "rebuilding trust" like Biden and Cheney use "our democracy"

[Skwor]

Basically the “professor” is tired of having to actually justify their lies and garbage, frustrated for being called out on the lies and propaganda they spew.

[Howie66]

Uh, no. The WEF needs to be destroyed.

[Sirius Lee]

Translation: “Our propaganda won’t stand up to scrutiny, so we have to ban scrutiny.”

[Red Badger]

If you don’t like it don’t use it, but don’t tell me I can’t use it!!!!.........

[rbg81]

We can’t dictate The Narrative = “Scary” and “Dangerous”

[eyeamok]

We need to silence all criticism of our propaganda...

[Retrofitted]

I thought she was quitting social media because everytime she opened her mouth about global climate changing warmth she got slapped upside the head (ExxonMobil was the last one that did it, after she claimed the corp had found more evidence of climate stuff and hid it).

Like all the others, she can't support her positions, she gets slammed for being a useless idjit, and then runs for a safe place to be stupid among her peers.

[bk1000]

You can pick them out of a line-up every time.
What is it with liberals and their appearance?
It’s like they look unattractive on purpose.
Kind of explains Rush’s theory on feminism.

[kiryandil]

[Da Coyote]

Each and every day, Harvard demonstrates once again that they're not exactly firing on 8 1 cylinder. What a joke that place has become.

[cgbg]

Harvard Professors now get to declare themselves the arbiter of truth—and get to enforce it by censorship?

These sociopaths need to go on trial as enemies of humanity.

[I want the USA back]

Of course they want the government to monitor and control all expressions of thought!

They’ll be doing more of it this year since they are obsessed with stopping Trump.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Gee whiz perfesser. Miffed that your favorite echo chamber isn't what it used to be?

Too bad. So sad.

[Tench_Coxe]

"They’ll be doing more of it this year since they are obsessed with stopping Trump."

Not so much Trump, but those who believe in America as founded.

[Jim W N]

The only thing freedom and free speech threatens is government.

Cry me a river.

[hinckley buzzard]

Yup. That’s it in a nutshell.

[Orosius]

Harvard needs to change its motto from Veritas to Mendacium.

[metmom]

Hmmm..... Leftist *logic*.

Censoring words you don’t like is *free speech*.

Excluding people on the basis of skin color is *inclusion and diversity*.

It is kind of breath taking the kind of deception Satan ahs so many people under that they could even begin to reconcile two such polar opposites. That’s a massive amount of cognitive dissonance.

[jacknhoo]

“I have given up on X. What a scary name that even is, right.”

_______________________________________

Such a BS statement. These are the ideological freaks that want your elementary schoolchildren experimenting with fisting and tasting each others’ semen, etc. Talk about scary.