Smith is a danger to the the RAT party’s Marxist “democrazy”.
Most members appointed by Democraps.
This is yet another example of why this whole effort is all theatrics for public consumption and devoid of any legal basis whatsoever.
It will be entertaining to read the forthcoming SCOTUS opinions in dissent, but I have a major ‘grain of salt’ effect in consideration that some - if not all - of SCOTUS are compromised under the yet-unnamed DS influence campaign against the rule of law (USC) in the US.
“... he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court, or in the underlying prosecution, than Tom Brady, Warren Buffett, or Beyoncé,” the brief argues.”
Personally, I’d go with Josh Allen over Tom Brady.
And Beyoncé? No, go with someone you can trust, like Shakira. Her hips don’t lie.
Special council requires Congressional authorization for a reason.
Without that authorization and oversight it could quickly degenerate into a Presidential, taxpayer funded, political attack with misuse. That misuse includes a lack of adequate Judge oversight in gathering evidence, illegal use of espionage material, misuse of public funds, and improper use of grand juries, as well as restriction of jurisdiction and potential illegal sharing of illegal evidence.
I know, I know, that would never happen with Democrats…………..ROFLOL
Why is it that not one of our Republican Congressmen, women and Senators never said a word about this?
All the way back to Herr Mueller the Republican party didn’t have clue.
This was known when the appointment was first made. So why now?? Perhaps everything that Smith did between now and then MUST be thrown out??
Special Counsel Jack Smith is a crazy fanatic of a man. He runs marathons. Look it up. He thinks he is a superman who can run roughshod over Trump, the laws and everything. He would make a perfect communist dictator and authoritarian. What Trump is often accused of.
But ugly within and without, Jack Smith is the real thing.
This should be a slam dunk.
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s appointment of Smith — a private citizen — is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.
Attorney General Merrick Garland needs to be charged for doing so he had to know what he was doing Biden’s orders or not guilty of the fact.
It’s in DC, this Smith guy is bulletproof there.
I’ve read the amicus brief and its a good argument.
There was a law allowing for “special counsels” - in limited cases - but that law expired in 1999 and congress specifically did not renew it. Janet Reno (Clinton’s AG) then wrote some procedural rules for the DOJ touching on outside/private special counsels, but those in no way could be stretched to cover what Garland/Smith are up to.
If the court rules that Jack Smith was appointed illegally and he is really just a regular citizen. Every Last bit of evidence he has gathered must be Thrown Out as fruit from the poisonous tree, Am I correct?
His proper title in Inquisitor Plenipotentiary.
.
Jack Smith has no integrity, honesty, honor, or decency. The worst part of him is that he has no shame for being this way.
Seems like a good argument. I wonder though if it is easily fixable by Garland reassigning the case to an actual, lawful US Attorney who then brings on the Jacobin as an assistant. It might require then re-indicting the cases from scratch… and it would remove the fig leaf that this is anything other than the ruling party going after its opponents. And it would kick this aspect of the lawfare down the road past the November election.
Two of the three judges on the panel are Biden appointees. The third judge was appointed by Bush I.
Can Jack Smith even practice law ? LOL