Posted on 01/05/2024 4:38:30 PM PST by Robwin
The lawsuit was filed in CA...I guess Judicial Watch does not want to deal with DC jury...But, I think Justice Department would probably succeed in moving the case to DC...After all, the shooting happened in DC...
DC jury...Not generally sympathetic to police...In my opinion...It is also very likely that DC jury is not very pro-Trump...
I think that it will be very hard for Judicial Watch to convince the DC jury to act in favor of Aaron Babbitt...
It would be nice if Aaron Babbitt gets a good settlement without going through a trial...
At a trial, Justice Department could bring up some bad incident involving Ashli Babbitt...
At one time, Ashli was married to somebody else...Aaron lived with another woman...Ashli and Aaron fell in love...Aaron's girlfriend called Ashli's husband...Then Ashli rammed that woman's car with her SUV...Ashli knocked on the window of that woman's car...She wanted to fight...
That woman's name is Celeste Norris...She even got a restraining order against Ashli...Norris got the money for the damage from Ashli's insurance company...
‘I Lived in Fear’: Woman Speaks Out About Time Ashli Babbitt Rammed SUV Into Her Car
I doubt that Aaron wants to sit through a trial while Justice Department lawyers are portraying his wife in a very negative way...
Do not misunderstand...There is nothing wrong with Aaron Babbitt filing a lawsuit...I just want to point out that it will be not easy...
👍
interesting analysis
Thank you.
Do we have an accurate count of the number of protesters who entered the building? And what is the number of suspected provocateurs among them?
Aaron Babbitt And Judicial Watch File 30 Million Dollar Wrongful Death Claim For Ashli Babbitt
“Byrd lied”
Yes. Byrd lied. He killed a person in cold blood, lied about the happenings of that day, and then was promoted for his efforts.
pelosi hid him out and refused to reveal his name for 6 months.
That’s an interesting piece of information. The only question I would have is it relevant? Could the government get it admitted to show Ashley was involved in a previous violent act? Is it relevant to the case at hand? Could the plaintiff negate the impact by stipulating she had a previous restraining order?
How about some FR practicing attorneys weighing in on the legal strategy that may be used on both sides?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.