Skip to comments.
House Members to Receive Classified UFO Briefing
Hot Air ^
 | Jazz
Posted on 01/05/2024 7:44:24 AM PST by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next  last
    
To: Openurmind; Churchjack; eastforker; Levy78; maddog55; Jonty30; GingisK; Mark17; spirited irish; ...
2
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:44:58 AM PST
by 
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
 
To: RoosterRedux
3
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:46:12 AM PST
by 
DouglasKC
 
To: DouglasKC
4
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:47:09 AM PST
by 
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
 
To: RoosterRedux
    Stop wasting our time on cr**. Biden has already said every one is welcome.
 
5
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:47:38 AM PST
by 
Sacajaweau
( )
 
To: RoosterRedux
    I’m waiting for a Wikileaks or a Snowden event in which briefings like this one find their way out to the public.
Things would get real interesting real fast.
 
To: RoosterRedux
    People are beginning to get annoyed over insider trading, time to trot out the shiny object.
 
7
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:48:29 AM PST
by 
brownsfan
(It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
 
To: RoosterRedux
    Whatever it comes to, more of the rulers will get rich.
 
8
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:53:34 AM PST
by 
Luke21
 
To: RoosterRedux
    If they’re not visibly shaken, crying, and drinking lots of water after the briefing, then they didn’t get full disclosure.
 
9
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:53:35 AM PST
by 
Sirius Lee
(Next week on The Bickersons...)
 
To: RoosterRedux
    If they land in Texas, I hope Governor Abbott buses them to New York City.
 
To: DouglasKC
    If it were a psyop, why would the defense industry and the DOD/CIA be so determined to kill the Disclosure Amendment to the NDAA and why would they have worked so diligently to stigmatize anyone trying to report a UFO for the last 70 years?
Military pilots are coming forth now saying that in the past they were warned that, if they spoke publicly about UFOs, they would be subjected to a psychiatric examination and lose their wings.
You can't have it both ways. It can't be both a DOD psyop and something declared to be insane by the same DOD.
11
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:56:17 AM PST
by 
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
 
To: Sacajaweau
    You’re the one wasting your time here. If this subject is a waste of time to you, go away.
 
12
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:57:37 AM PST
by 
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
 
To: RoosterRedux
    Because it’s preposterous poppycock.
 
To: RoosterRedux
14
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:57:56 AM PST
by 
Beowulf9
 
To: Sacajaweau
15
posted on 
01/05/2024 7:58:00 AM PST
by 
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
 
To: GreenHornet
16
posted on 
01/05/2024 8:00:21 AM PST
by 
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
 
To: RoosterRedux
    Guys, this is a very simple logic problem...
1.) Aliens are NOT real
1.)A - The government wants you to mistakenly think they are real
or
1.)B - The government doesn’t want you to mistakenly think they are real
2.) Aliens are real
2.)A - The government wants the truth to come out
or
2.)B - The government doesn’t want the truth to come out
If it was 2.)A (real + wants truth known), they would just have a press conference on national TV and tell us the truth about them.
If it was 1.)B (not real + doesn’t want public confused), they would be making at least a little attempt at actively debunking these “whistle blowers”.
If it was 2.)B (real + doesn’t want truth out), the “whistle blowers” would immediately get the Snowdon/Assange/Gary Webb/Terrance Yeakey/Seth Rich treatment and you would have never heard about it.
If it was 1.)A (not real + wants you confused), everything would be going down exactly as it is going down.
 
17
posted on 
01/05/2024 8:00:24 AM PST
by 
nitzy
(I wonder if the telescreens in 1984 were first called "free Obamascreens")
 
To: DouglasKC
    If a pilot sees something he cannot explain when on training or in an operation, why is that poppycock? Why would he be told to never report such stuff?
It might be just a balloon or something from an adversary.
Are balloons or drones from adversaries poppycock?
18
posted on 
01/05/2024 8:00:32 AM PST
by 
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
 
To: nitzy
    You are stupid enough to think that the government is a single monolithic body, are you?
19
posted on 
01/05/2024 8:02:10 AM PST
by 
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
 
To: RoosterRedux
    Why in the world would UFO info need to be ‘classified?’
 
20
posted on 
01/05/2024 8:02:15 AM PST
by 
fwdude
(.)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson