Supreme Court rejects Jack Smith’s request for justices to quickly hear Trump immunity dispute

CNN ^ | 12/22/23 | devan cole

[C210N]

CNN —

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office – a move that will likely delay his trial.

The court did not explain its reasoning and there were no noted dissents.

[C210N]

Big blow to illegal jack smith, who has no authority doing what he is attempting to do.

[Mouton]

I don’t want to hear explanations. The state of Alabama has its procedure. And that procedure at this point in time is to have an arraignment. Are we clear on this?”

[ought-six]

His appointment as special counsel was clearly unconstitutional. Hell, even the lefty ABA agrees the appointment was unconstitutional.

https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/was-jack-smiths-appointment-unconstitutional-he-has-no-more-authority-than-taylor-swift-amicus-brief-argues

[StAnDeliver]

Waiting for the demented Ronlims to complain that now SCOTUS is also all-in on ‘The Scheme’ to deny DeSantis his rightful spot on the GOP ballot in 3,2,1...

[Shady]

Jackboot Smith needs to be disbarred.

[EliRoom8]

This apparently disrupts the plans of Jack Smith and (partisan) Judge Chutkan to get things rolling in early March.

[WeaslesRippedMyFlesh]

Speaking of Mike Nifong...

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

ABA Journal: Garland should “ask one of the very best Senate-confirmed U.S. attorneys now in office to prosecute the cases arising out of the events of Jan. 6, 2021, or the misuse of classified documents case, to be special counsel” with nationwide authority.

What does "very best" mean? Just sayin'.

[cowboyusa]

MERRY CHRISTMAS FREEPERS! Marxist tears on twitter are so yummy.