Did vaccines after 1953 reduce childhood mortality?
https://metatron.substack.com/cp/139744148
Pfizer Did Not Know What the Covid Vaccines Actually Do in the Body
https://unglossed.substack.com/p/pfizer-did-not-know-what-the-covid
DECEPTION: Their own data played back.
A forensic analysis of Vaccine injuries and Covid deaths in N.I. A Case Study 2020-2023
https://hughmccarthy.substack.com/p/deception-their-own-data-played-back
Reiner Fuellmich is back!
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich - Injected Behaving As Though Lobotomized, Brain Damaged. Brought to you By Mayor Rudy Giuliani JD Jack Smith Russell Blaylock Scott Kory Col Slate Orbán Dr Bhakdi with Dr Wolf & Dr Fuellmich of ICIC Crooke SEA BREEZE Harvey Ris
https://rumble.com/v427h1q-245572622.html
From your 2nd link:
At no point was true pharmacology of BNT162b2 ever assessed. The famous “rat distribution” study comes closest. It at least uses the same LNP construct as BNT162b2, but with RNA encoding luciferase rather than the spike protein. As openly admitted in the introduction:
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf p. 40.
At no point did Pfizer or BioNTech have any idea what their product was doing or would actually do in humans.
discussion, with a reference given by your 2nd link, if I’m tracking it correctly.
Makes reference to the website Coffee and Covid:
Coffee and Covid linked to three Korean studies showing increased rates of complications post Covid jabs…
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.14.23298544v1?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298565v1?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566v1?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Digging two or three layers down into your sources I found this gem:
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/dont-be-arrsey
(Exceprt)
= = = = = = = = = = = =
What did the Pfizer “95%” study (C4591001) actually show?
So few people know this that it drives me crazy, and I have been going on about it for two years. Hey ho.
They told you. It’s in the NEJM paper and it’s in the VRBPAC submission (see footnote). Note that the NEJM paper was published on the 10th December 2020, which is the same date that the submission to the FDA’s VRBPAC committee was presented. The Pfizer BNT162b2 GTV was “approved” the very next day, with no attempt to assess the 350,000 pages of documentation that the FDA requested 55 years to release to the public.
Here is the full 8 hour podcast of the committee meeting on the 10th Dec (the EUA approval was 11th Dec). Of course you don’t need any time to assess the documentation around a product if you have already decide to approve it!
And the outcome? Just one thing - can you see it?
OK the yellow highlighter should help but this is the single finding of benefit in the Pfizer study:
The only clinical benefit recorded in the Pfizer C4591001 study published in the NEJM on the 10th Dec 2020 was: "a 95% reduction in the chance of testing positive for COVID by a PCR test conducted at Pfizer's laboratory in Pearl River"
What, you didn’t know? You thought that the Pfizer vaccine had a myriad of magical powers? Nope.
Just to push the point home these are some of the things that people think the Pfizer study showed, but it did not1:
❌ Reduced COVID symptoms by 95%
❌ Reduced COVID symptoms by any amount
❌ Reduced transmission of COVID
❌ Reduced deaths from COVID
❌ Reduced deaths from any cause
❌ Reduced the chance of getting “long COVID”
❌ Reduced the number days taken off work
❌ Reduced COVID hospitalisations or ICU admissions
❌ Reduced the chance of testing positive for COVID by more than 2 months
❌ Reduced the chance of testing positive for COVID at any other laboratory than Pearl River
= = = = = = =
Read the whole article, it gets much much WORSE (for Pfizer and the mythical 95%).