Posted on 12/04/2023 8:34:00 AM PST by Red Badger
Disney's special governing district was “a stunning deviation from the good governance standards of the State of Florida,” audit concludes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Disney secured the ability to effectively govern itself in Florida for more than half a century by performing a “bait and switch” on the state, and used its “complete and unaccountable governmental power” to “maximize its profits” at “the expense of the public good,” according to an independent audit of the entertainment giant’s role in the state.
The audit of the Reedy Creek Improvement District (RCID), which was established by Florida to bring Disney’s business to the state in 1966, found that Disney seized complete control of the government entity, and used the structure to establish itself as one of the world’s largest corporations. The report, obtained by The Daily Wire, says the steps Disney took to maintain control over RCID are “shocking,” and that its establishment “facilitated the most egregious exhibition of corporate cronyism in modern American history.”
The report comes nine months after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis eliminated the Disney-controlled district, in a move his critics said was motivated by his political fight with the company. DeSantis said he took action because Disney should “live under the same laws as everybody else,” and that “allowing a corporation to control its own government is bad policy.”
The audit’s findings will likely be seen as a vindication of DeSantis, with the report stating that RCID’s 55-year stint “represented a stunning deviation from the good governance standards of the State of Florida.”
The audit consisted of a forensic audit of the district’s finances, as well as an analysis of governing structures and urban planning. It found that Disney used shady tactics to maintain its control of power, hand-picking government officials, and making payments to district employees that were “akin to bribes.” It also used the district to avoid taxation, and thrust costs on taxpayers in surrounding communities.
George Mason Law School Professor Donald Kochan, one of the independent auditors, found that Disney knew it wanted to govern itself, and deceived Florida to attain the Reedy Creek structure.
Disney told Florida it would build a city around a single theme park, complete with “affordable housing, transportation, and other community services,” the report noted. Kochan explains that Disney “quickly abandoned its city-building pretense.” It instead built the modern Disney World, consisting of several theme parks, four golf courses, and dozens of hotels — with no housing and services only offered to tourists.
“The RCID was a mousetrap,” the report states. “Disney dangled savory cheese in front of the Florida Legislature and the people of Orlando, but quickly abandoned its city-building pretense.”
Kochan says this was always Disney’s plan, because having a real population in the district would threaten its control.
“The historical record demonstrates that Disney disdained voters from the outset and did not want its special district or its corporate choices to be subject to public accountability through popular elections,” Kochan states. “Documentary evidence from Walt Disney himself makes clear that he did not want permanent residents in his model community.”
Kochan told The Daily Wire in an interview on his audit that it was “a bait and switch,” but that even if Disney held up its end of the bargain, it would have still been a mistake for Florida.
“I do not conclude in this report that had they fulfilled these promises, this would have been a good idea,” Kochan said. “The governance structure was a bad idea. We would have hoped that the legislature never would have been seduced by the narrative in the first place.”
The report lays out how even the democratic aspects of the RCID were meticulously controlled by Disney. Board members, for example, were only eligible if they owned land in the district, so Disney would temporarily deed plots of inaccessible land that board members could hold during the duration of their service, and forfeit it back to Disney at the end. The company would even continue to pay the property tax for the board members.
The system ensured that the board “would be responsive to Disney’s preferences and would serve Disney’s interests,” the report states.
“Because The Walt Disney Company controlled the election of the Board of Supervisors, the Board of Supervisors effectively reported to Disney and represented Disney’s interests,” it says. “This created the potential for corruption.”
The financial audit appears to uncover areas where corruption may have existed, as well as potential tax fraud, according to the report.
William Jennings, a forensic accountant who is regularly hired by the federal government to conduct investigations, found that Disney treated the district employees that were supposed to be regulating it like employees.
Reedy Creek Improvement District employees were treated to benefits such as complimentary annual passes for themselves and family members, as well as steep discounts on products and related services, such as Disney cruises. The report states that “showering gifts and lavish spending on RCID employees” created the “impression that these employees worked to achieve the interests of Disney, not of the District or other property owners.”
The audit states that these “improper” payments were “akin to bribes of public officials” when they were coming from Disney. In recent years, the district has reimbursed Disney for the benefits, categorizing the perks as “financial and administrative services.”
The district also failed to include the benefits as taxable income to the IRS, even after employees brought the tax issue up to leadership. The district administrator, John Classe, said that the benefits — which included annual passes for each employee and three or more family members — were part of “employee training.” The report criticizes Classe’s statement as “not plausible,” noting “RCID employees received the tickets regardless of their job duties and for the use of their friends and family.”
Jennings found that the same administrator, Classe, in a 15-month span put $166,000 on the RCID’s American Express card for “celebrations, sports tickets, memberships, meetings, and other events,” including roughly $23,000 for “entertainment and golf.”
The “stunning deviation from … good governance standards” was allowed to happen due to a lack of oversight.
“Hardly anyone outside of the special district knew about the scope and scale of the problems plaguing it,” the auditors found. “Complete and unaccountable governmental power was handed over to a private corporation, transforming a democratic institution into a private corporate monopoly.”
The report concludes that the failure to competently govern Disney was “disastrous for the surrounding communities of Central Florida,” who were on the hook for housing, schooling, hospitals, and other public services for the company’s massive workforce.
“Over 100,000 people work in the District, but they must commute from elsewhere because the District has no workforce housing,” the report explains, noting that it was also “not home to any schools, hospitals, or libraries and instead foists those costs upon the surrounding communities which must supply those services for Disney employees and their families.”
Disney’s urban planning was “focused almost entirely on optimizing corporate goals,” rather than the needs of its workforce, which consists predominantly of people with “relatively low-wage service industry jobs,” all living outside the district.
The audit acknowledges that Disney has had positive impacts on the region, but posits that it could have helped Central Florida just as much without taking the measures it did to govern itself.
The legislation eliminating Reedy Creek Improvement District mandated that the audit be completed within a year of its passing in February 2023. Democratic lawmakers last week introduced legislation to restore the district, stating that the new governing structure put in place by DeSantis, the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, has “no transparency.”
The auditors also found that Disney took many steps to memorialize its control over the district in the final days of Reedy Creek, even entering into a hundred year contract with the district. The new Central Florida Tourism Oversight District is fighting to nullify these so-called “11th-hour agreements” in court.
The report’s authors say Disney’s fight is not a surprise.
“No one would expect a company that’s grown obese on a steady diet of gigantic portions of exemptions and privileges to peacefully pass back the plate,” it states.
The report will be sent to DeSantis and the legislature later on Monday. It can be read in full here.
https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/12/CFTOD.pdf
PING!.................
Can’t say that I blame Disney for wanting to keep the Karens out of their business.
Let’s not forget that Walt and his brother were both alive at the time.................
The name of the EPCOT Center is an acronym, standing for Experimental Prototype Community Of Tomorrow.
The original plan was that there would be an actual City with people living and working there, using experimental new technologies in their daily lives.
But that plan was done away with at some point, and then the Epcot Center evolved into a theme park.
Disney bought off the politicians and effectively had a corrupt deal. I’d like to see the politicians thrown in jail, Disney just did what would benefit themselves.
As good of a guy as Walt was, Epcot was ultimately a poor idea.
Disney wanted a city where he could control everything about how people work and live, without their having any real say in the matter. Not exactly constitutional.
Of course, the feds today are much worse and answerable to no one, unlike Reedy Creek.
Henry Ford tried it decades earlier.
Google ‘Fordlandia’................
This is not surprising.
More regulatory capture.
Seems to now be another type of performance art.
The plan was done away with right after Walt’s death.
EPCOT the city would never have worked. But since the district was already approved Disney took advantage of it. And they brought in so much money that FL just looked the other way. Until Disney Corp stepped in it by attacking DeSantis.
Guaranteed if it weren’t for Cabal, and the Christian side of the family kicked out, Disney would have been the best education for the children of the world to take them into the next era. That doesn’t work if Satan wants our children groomed while the world destroyed. We’d all be quantum by now and in a good way. It could have been the greatest tool in the world for the true gospel and how to live in the Kingdom of God because people actually love and care about each other and work out their issues civilly. I’ve been praying many, many decades for God to turn all that around.
He will...............bet on it...................
Swamp rat with a lot of govt swamp help to achieve its crony capitalism kingdom
This is a confusing saga. I posted an article a few weeks ago claiming the legislation had been repealed. This is a recent article about a vote to do just that.
https://www.wesh.com/article/disney-law-repeal-bill/45987984
The Dems are trying to repeal it, but they don’t have the majority to do so..........................
The promise of good wages encouraged many to sign up, but Ford’s curious set of town rules soon created discontent. Workers were forbidden from drinking alcohol, smoking tobacco or even playing football, while women were banned. Inspectors visited houses to ensure the rules were being obeyed.
i can see that as being a problem...
Also, they could not eat their own types of foods that they were used to.
They had to eat ‘American’ foods, which they found to be distasteful, and some could not digest them properly...............
one of his better ideas...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.