Posted on 12/01/2023 6:14:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind
In a revealing interview with Liz Gunn, a New Zealand government data administrator identified as Winston Smith has come forward with startling claims regarding the consequences of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in New Zealand.
Winston Smith emphasizes that he is not an anti-vaxxer. He clarifies that he has been vaccinated in the past and has even contributed to building the COVID vaccination system in New Zealand, which gave him access to the data , making it clear that his stance is not born from opposition to vaccines on principle.
Winston findings on the mortality rates associated with various COVID-19 vaccine batches present a very concerning picture, suggesting a correlation that seems highly improbable to occur by chance alone. For instance, looking at the top ten batches with the highest mortality rate, he found the following:
For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate
Batch 8, with a 17% mortality rate,
Batch 3 with 15% mortality rate
Even among larger sample sizes, such as batch number 70 that vaccinated 11,000 individuals, there were 498 deaths accounted for, representing a 4% mortality rate.
Such numbers vastly exceed the expected mortality rates which is 0.75% and with Smith's meticulous approach and diverse age distribution consideration, the suggestion that these outcomes are mathematically bordering on impossible becomes difficult to ignore.
Winston also illustrated the data from the perspective of the vaccinators. The most extreme case presented by Smith – labeled simply as “Vaccinator One” – paints a grim picture: out of 246 vaccinations administered by “Vaccinator One”, there had been 60 deaths, marking nearly a 25% mortality rate. Again, this figure dwarfs the expected mortality rate of 0.75%. When examining further, this pattern seemed to persist across profiles; another vaccinator had seen nearly 17% mortality, with 104 deaths out of 621 vaccinations given.
The data unequivocally suggests that there is a statistically significant correlation between specific vaccine batches and the subsequent mortality rates observed. It would be mathematically implausible to attribute these high rates of death following vaccination to random chance alone, thereby implicating the batches as a significant factor in the increased mortality.
If you have an hour available, I recommend viewing the entire video for a comprehensive understanding. However, if time is scarce, here is a condensed 10-minute version that captures the crucial highlights.
Signing off for now
A17
Quick Update: There have been remarks suggesting that the raw data has not been made available. My advice to Liz Gunn and the whistleblower would be to anonymize and then publish the raw data set. If you know them, please let them know. Otherwise, this story is not as credible as it seems!
We shall wait and see what happens.
Update 2: Raw data will be made available during(or after) Steve Kirsch presentation at MIT tomorrow. Here is the rumble link.
Update 3: The data is available for download at Steve Kirsch’s substack below.
Ping for your interest
For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate
Batch 8, with a 17% mortality rate,
Batch 3 with 15% mortality rate
Even among larger sample sizes, such as batch number 70 that vaccinated 11,000 individuals, there were 498 deaths accounted for, representing a 4% mortality rate.
Such numbers vastly exceed the expected mortality rates which is 0.75% and with Smith’s meticulous approach and diverse age distribution consideration, the suggestion that these outcomes are mathematically bordering on impossible becomes difficult to ignore.
21% ... 17% ... 15% ... 4% ... mortality rate....
The Daisy Duke $hot $hills will STILL deny.
But, what more do we expect from CDC/BigPharma bots?
“Winston Smith”? As in Orwell’s 1984? Forgive me if I’m a bit wary of this story.
It’s denialism tied in with egoism, tied in with societal pressure and societal inertia.
That’s why.
so they had some minor issues with production quality control that got better over time.
nothing to see here, move on already
All kinds of isms 😂
RE: so they had some minor issues with production quality control that got better over time.
Yep, but what about the poor slobs who were FORCED by government to take the tainted quality vaccines?
“ For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate”
************************************************************
I wonder if they’ve tracked down (or plan to track down) all 711 individuals to do DETAILED health assessments. It would seem to be negligent to not do so.
“21% ... 17% ... 15% ... 4% ... mortality rate....
The Daisy Duke $hot $hills will STILL deny.
But, what more do we expect from CDC/BigPharma bots?”
Yep, the Branch Covidians are always going to be here and try to gaslight us.
What insane person would think that almost 1% would be acceptable?
For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So is the reader to assume the timeframe for these fatalities are from the initial rollout of the batch to today? Are most of the fatalities immediately after the shot and then taper off? Or do they mostly start after a year or two? Since they have the data that people died, they likely know when they died....
Pfizer just might end up wishing it would have been satisfied with the profits it made from Viagra.
p
The odds in this lottery are good. Well, it does depend on what counts as a “win”.
To re-work the old saying: If you don’t play you won’t lose.
Gives it away as satire.
Good catch... but it could be a real name.
Think this had anything to do with Jacinda Ardern resigning unexpectedly in January & beating cheeks to get out of New Zealand? I will never forget a video of her smirking & laughing when questioned about her draconian mandates making life very difficult for anyone refusing the jabs.
My first thought when I saw the name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.