Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/24/2023 2:15:34 PM PST by John S Mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby

By changing “digital votes” to paper ballots and requiring photo ID and signature verification.


2 posted on 11/24/2023 2:24:23 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Just ban all electronic voting


3 posted on 11/24/2023 2:24:29 PM PST by DaBeerfreak (As long as the politicians believe they're not the problem; we have a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby
Make the polling locations wifi 'dead zones'. No cell service, etc. for the duration of the election. Outside connections via LAN or modem are also shut down.
Any poll worker of official found in violation goes directly to jail once found out. Any officer of the court intervening also goes to jail, up to and including AGs.
4 posted on 11/24/2023 2:24:53 PM PST by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Take the door off a microwave oven an bypass the interlocks and you’ve got a Wi-Fi jammer. Just don’t get near it (unless you’re done having kids).


8 posted on 11/24/2023 2:34:23 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

How do they do secure money transfers around the world?
Same technology.
Traceable, and very secure.
The existing system is from the 60’s based on punchcards.
I stopped using them when I was in High School.


11 posted on 11/24/2023 2:43:32 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

It’s not clear that this would accomplish anything, because a dedicated fraudster could theoretically transmit data over the power line.

Ultimately, there are simply too many ways to alter incoming votes AT or within the voting machine. There might be some value to providing a checksum; where all the votes are “added up” into a giant number that overflows continuously, destroying its most significant digit, but ends up with (say) a unique 6 or 8 digit number which could be compared at site “A” with (what should be) that same number at site “B”; both on a calculator-type roll of paper generated at the machine and also transmitted in a separate data packet to wherever the voting machine’s data is transmitted to.

We used to do this with PROMs. Programmable Read Only Memory. Used for machine firmware. The PROM is huge field of 8 or 16-bit numbers which were machine code for the operating software for some machine. The PROMs are “burnt” in a (what else?) PROM burner. All those 8 bit numbers are added up, which turns into a gigantic number, but the significant digits are continually thrown out. In other words, you simply add up 8,192 numbers of 8 digits each. The result is a gigantic number but you don’t care about the billions and gazillions. You just take the last 8 digits of the final number. Now you match that 8 digit number at some point with what should be that same 8 digit number at another location. Trust me, if there is *any* alteration in *any* of those 8 digit numbers of the 8,192, the checksums will not match. It will not tell you WHERE or WHAT the error(s) is/are, but will tell that something is hinky with near metaphysical accuracy.

Please forgive me for reiterating 1982 technology. But the concept is still used.


14 posted on 11/24/2023 2:53:25 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (The Democrat breadlines will be gluten-free. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

I’ve been a computer software engineer for 30 years. If someone would ask me I could tell them exactly how. And exactly why.

I could also explained everything that went wrong in the 2020 election.


16 posted on 11/24/2023 3:14:59 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Use a Dominion tabulator that counts paper ballots which are archived to preserve the audit trail. That’s standard for every election in Canada except at the federal level, where to this day paper ballots are hand-counted after the polls close on Election Night.


17 posted on 11/24/2023 3:16:10 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (I don't run; if you see me running, you should run too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Super glue the door shut on remote ballot drop boxes.


18 posted on 11/24/2023 3:19:33 PM PST by IAGeezer912 (One out of every 20 people on the face of the earth are Americans. We have won life's lottery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby; All

Voter ID, in person same day voting, paper ballots.


19 posted on 11/24/2023 3:36:18 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

SHUT DOWN THE GRID, Hand count on paper ballots


26 posted on 11/24/2023 4:18:59 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

How about everyone has to vote in person, with a paper ballot, and we have them dip their fingers in purple dye to make sure they don’t vote more than once? I think I’ve seen this before.


27 posted on 11/24/2023 5:42:07 PM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

“Wondering if the Tech experts and election legal experts here on FR could suggest how to prevent supposedly “not connected to the internet” (which turned out to BE connected and transmitting to sat uplinks to Europe and, back. “

The voting machines were never connected to the internet. You are confusing that claim.

Precinct data was not sent to Europe.

Precinct data is sent to the state via secured methods.


29 posted on 11/24/2023 6:47:13 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Hypothetically as one person at one poll location? Pop a spark gap generator at the site, and make sure surveillance cameras and other tech cannot catch you dropping it, as FCC No-Likey. You would have to hide it, so they could not find it. I am guessing if it surprised them, they would not be able to track it down in time to fix the problem. Indeed most might just attribute it all to come WiFi connection problems. But that would accomplish nothing nationwide.

The real answer is blow open the covert intel operation running America, by exposing the surveillance between now and then. If you could get the surveillance exposed and put it on its heels, I am not sure they could rig the election without that criminal surveillance operation’s overwatch.

People do not understand. The problem is not a handful of Democrat poll workers. It is a whole secret society of citizen informants with an organization based off the old East German Stasi, operating as a professional intelligence operation taking over the US.

With that operational, you will not stop the next election from being rigged.


34 posted on 11/24/2023 6:55:32 PM PST by AnonymousConservative (DO NOT send me sensitive information - http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/surveillance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Use paper votes and scanners - and find some honest and capable IT folks....


41 posted on 11/25/2023 3:01:13 AM PST by trebb (So many fools - so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson