Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John S Mosby

By changing “digital votes” to paper ballots and requiring photo ID and signature verification.


2 posted on 11/24/2023 2:24:23 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

That would be optimal.


6 posted on 11/24/2023 2:25:49 PM PST by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Impossible.


9 posted on 11/24/2023 2:34:28 PM PST by Jonty30 (It turns out that I did not buy my cell phone for all the calls I might be missing at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Print out multiple copies of the totals. Then send the printouts through multiple handlers tothe central collection location.


25 posted on 11/24/2023 4:16:10 PM PST by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind bweek.lows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“By changing “digital votes” to paper ballots and requiring photo ID and signature verification.”

Votes are tabulated by precinct before sending the numbers to the state. Paper ballots and ID would have no effect on transmission of the results.


28 posted on 11/24/2023 6:31:03 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson