probably what they are doing to fake global warming data.
this should put a lot of scientists out of work.
Papers have been published showing that it is impossible to produce an AI that can distinguish texts that have been produced by an AI.
Like that lawyer who got caught citing a fake precedent in a brief he submitted in court (and finally confessed it had been written by ChatGPT), and
Dr Jordan Peterson catching ChatGPT giving him a fake reference for a research paper that did not exist.
On a tangential note, I have noticed more and more Internet “content” that is almost certainly AI-generated without informing the reader that it is AI-generated.
You can use the same methods to detect it that you use to spot phishing emails.
The sentences just aren’t quite right. Repetitious sentences in different paragraphs.
Bottom line is, if you suspect it is AI-generated, it probably is.
Between the search engine algorithms that only return content that fits the globalist narrative and fake AI articles, the Interwebs is becoming less and less useful.
What makes you think it couldn’t be done by hand?
Most data in scientific journals go unexamined. It’s not like court.
ChatBots lie to me all the time, usually several times a week. They tell me “Your call is important to us...”
ChatGPT has been a handy tool for lazy, stupid, and/or ignorant paid anti-MAGA trolls here on FR, too ...