[Robert DeLong]

It's not you.

Nor is it you.

The Supreme Court needs to either decide what the founding fathers meant by Natural Born Citizen, or the Constitution needs to be changed to strike that requirement. That is how disagreements regarding the Constitution are settled. Either by the Supreme court to hear the case & rule on it, or to create an amendment that passes the Constitutional requirements to alter the Constitution.

Are you afraid to do what our Constitution demands to change the Constitution?

You sure sound like it. But what you are really doing is debasing the Constitution, which is the law of the land.

I can't help what you think, but do not say that this issue is settled, because it only makes you sound like a damn stupid Democrat. Besides that, there are more cranks in this country than just me. In fact, we have more of a right so speak out in support of the Constitution than you do to subvert it.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: The Supreme Court needs to either decide what the founding fathers meant by Natural Born Citizen ::

How does the Constitution begin?
We the People, not “we the citizens, having been affirmed by the Supreme Court”.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

Nor is it you.

The Supreme Court

Exactly - the federal court system is the mechanism that the US Constitution has put into place to make this decision. And it rejected all challenges to Obama's presidential qualifications. The Supreme Court has never even countenanced such cases, and the Chief Justice swore Obama into office.

Besides that, there are more cranks in this country than just me. In fact, we have more of a right so speak out in support of the Constitution than you do to subvert it.

Yes, sadly there will always be people who refuse to face reality and would rather tilt at windmills than tackle real problems. I said, rant away - just don't expect anyone to take you seriously. The Constitution you mention and the mechanisms it has put into place have already spoken on this issue, and they disagree with you.