Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate Conversations: Future of Fossil Fuels
The National Academies ^ | November 1, 2023 | Anonymous

Posted on 11/08/2023 9:47:44 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom

Join us for a discussion about the future of fossil fuels in a net-zero United States.

About this Event

As the United States decarbonizes its economy and strives for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, production and consumption of fossil fuels will need to decline substantially. Reducing fossil fuel usage will bring significant benefits, like lower emissions and better ambient air quality, but poses challenges for communities that are economically dependent on extraction and production. Marcius Extavour (TIME CO2) will moderate a conversation with Julia Haggerty (Montana State University) and Daniel Raimi (Resources for the Future) about the future of fossil fuels and how to address the technical and societal challenges associated with their changing role. The conversation will include discussion of environmental remediation, maintaining the safety and reliability of existing fossil fuel infrastructure, and socioeconomic impacts in fossil fuel dependent communities. The conversation will draw from the new National Academies report: Accelerating Decarbonization in the United States: Technology, Policy, and Societal Dimensions, including the chapter on The Future of Fossil Fuels.

The webinar will be webcast on the Climate Conversations: Fossil Fuels webpage on Thursday, November 16 from 3:00-4:15 pm ET. Closed captioning will be provided. The conversation will include questions from the audience and will be recorded and available to view on the page after the event.

Climate Conversations: Pathways to Action is a monthly webinar series from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that aims to convene high-level, cross-cutting, nonpartisan conversations about issues relevant to policy action on climate change.

[I like the way they show a plant stack emitting WATER VAPOR plus invisible CO2 and subtly hint that it is very dangerous to mankind.]

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalacademies.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bunchakooks; carbon; energy
Participant Bios

Marcius Extavour is the Chief Climate Solutions Officer at TIMECO2. His career combines science, innovation, business, capital, and storytelling to build and deploy climate and energy solutions. He has previously served as Chief Scientist and Executive Vice President for Climate and Energy at XPRIZE Foundation and held roles at the University of Toronto, U.S. Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources, Ontario Power Generation, and Nortel Networks, and holds a Ph.D. in quantum physics. He was named 2019 VERGE Vanguard Fellow, AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow, and member of the National Academies Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, and his work has been featured on CNBC, Business News Network, PBS NOVA, the Washington Post, The Economist, and The Atlantic.

Julia Haggerty is Associate Professor of Geography in the Department of Earth Sciences at Montana State University, where she leads the Resources & Communities Research Group in studying the ways rural communities respond to shifting economic and policy trajectories, especially as they involve natural resources. Haggerty has expertise in diverse rural geographies including those shaped by energy development, extractive industries, ranching and agriculture, and amenity development and conservation. Partnerships and collaboration with diverse stakeholders are central to her approach. She was a committee member for the recently published National Academies report: Accelerating Decarbonization in the United States: Technology, Policy, and Societal Dimensions.

Daniel Raimi is Director of the Equity in the Energy Transition Initiative at Resources for the Future and a lecturer at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. He works on a range of energy policy issues with a focus on tools to enable an equitable energy transition. In 2017, he published The Fracking Debate (Columbia University Press), a book that combines stories from his travels to dozens of oil- and gas-producing regions with a detailed examination of key policy issues.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in the conversation are those of the participants and do not necessarily represent the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.


These are the people that the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering believe should be shaping our energy future. What a pathetic bunch of hysterical climate propagandists, losers and nobodies. I remember when the National Academies was a prestigious organization and it was a big honor to be invited.
1 posted on 11/08/2023 9:47:44 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Fossil Fuels? Huh?
The correct scientific term includes a reference to Petrochemicals.


2 posted on 11/08/2023 9:49:43 AM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Meanwhile China, Russia, and Africa kick our butts while using fossil fuel.


3 posted on 11/08/2023 9:52:07 AM PST by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

“Meanwhile China, Russia, and Africa kick our butts while using fossil fuel.”

You’d almost think these useful idiots were on the enemy’s side, wouldn’t you?

Add India to your list.


4 posted on 11/08/2023 10:08:32 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Honest Nigerian
--- "Fossil Fuels? Huh? The correct scientific term includes a reference to Petrochemicals.

Hydrocarbons. Necessary for most of modern life. I support the abiotic theory, that hyrdo -- water -- and carbon -- mineral -- combine under pressure, making the process wholly natural.

The only fossils I consider worth getting to "zero" are the politicians, old, white rich activists spouting the Mathusian line, and all the old fossil academics whose "assumptive close" -- a sales pitch technique -- is to step past the very basic discussions in favor of blather and more blather.

5 posted on 11/08/2023 10:17:28 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

“Decarbonizing our economy” equals suicide!!!!


6 posted on 11/08/2023 10:30:47 AM PST by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

“Decarbonizing our economy” equals suicide!!!!

ESPECIALLY when, as “Alternatives?” says, “Meanwhile China, Russia, and Africa kick our butts while using fossil fuel.” Plus India.

It’s almost like the people pushing this “decarbonization” are working for our enemies (political and economic).


7 posted on 11/08/2023 10:54:47 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

The end of “fossil” fuels is the end of food.


8 posted on 11/08/2023 11:44:25 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson