Posted on 10/21/2023 8:28:08 AM PDT by Signalman
Yesterday I was listening to Wayne Allyn Root's AM-radio show where he's based locally here in Vegas. He presented an interesting point. How many Democrats would be willing to go on-the-record and vote against Byron Donalds, who could be the first black in history to become Speaker Of The House?
It presents an interesting dilemma for the party that relies on blacks as one of their largest voting blocs.
The democrats always can invent reasons to vote against any Republican even if the reason is False. Count on it, if he becomes the Republican Candidate.
There are more than enough RINO GOPe who will crossover and vote the racist lowlife in.
“It presents an interesting dilemma for the party that relies on blacks as one of their largest voting blocs.”
Worse than that is the party relying on color to win a vote instead of a conservative. We don’t need extorsion. We need conservative work by a conservative person. If race is the deciding factor and not how to accomplish the platform, then it isn’t any different that it was. Smoke and mirrors leaving the rinos in command so the liberals can manipulate them as the liberals don’t care what a republican is colored. Just how much of a coward he/she is and how far they can be pushed..
wy69
Can you say Speaker Jefferies ???
I can say it, but if I actually see it, I’d better be seeing some retribution coming from the eight Republicans who did their darnedest to lead the party in the direction of needed changes. It isn’t the eight that made it possible for Hakeem. They did what was desperately needed. Given the opportunity, it was then up to the caucus to do what was necessary to replace the empty seat from their own people. So far they have proven incapable of providing what might seem so simple.
100% of white Democrats would vote against Daniels because according to their white President, Daniels “ain’t black” because he doesn’t vote for Biden.
*Frankly, I am over the “first black *****” shtick. I don’t like playing their games. You can’t vote against this guy or you’re racist.*
We could(and should) have some fun with this. Clarence Thomas all over again. Put the black caucus on the spot. America’s first black speaker beat Hakeem to it. More and more black male voters are up for grabs. There would be no ‘witness’ coming forward to derail the nomination.
It would be really funny if the republicans had set this up all along-Pearl Harbor-like. Look confused and all come together under Donalds. Keep in mind it will only a year+. Then reassess everything after Trump wins.
*Donalds
The greatest enemies of the America First/MAGA/Conservative movement in the “Speaker's” race are the GOP-E squishes; and they are TERRIFIED of being accused of racism. Donalds is the perfect person for conservatives to run against the GOP-E squishes. He and his team should study how Justice Thomas handled his confirmation hearing.
Race and gender don’t matter if there’s an R by the name. Sarah Palin had her garbage picked through and had vicious stories her son Trig was really her grandson circulating instead of a splashy Vogue spread heralding a woman VP candidate. I realize she was at a disadvantage as she was very attractive, fit and didn’t have a public affair with a married politician with power to give her a job to start her career.
Bryan Donald’s will have every inch of his life exposed without that “D” by his name but I’ve seen him in interviews and he can handle it. Wonder if he made a deal with Jim Jordan?
I saw a pic of him when he became aware of his name being bandied about. He smiled like he peed his pants right then and there, standing up - running down his leg in a warm stream.
Considering that the Dims have been exclusively voting for the black Hakeem Jeffries, this is a really humiliating thing for Root to say. He probably thinks Democrats are voting for Pelosi.
That said, ask yourself this question: How many people would vote against the first Hispanic Supreme Court Justice?
Answer: All of the Democrats would, if he were nominated by a Republican.
Democrats filibustered George W. Bush's nomination of Miguel Estrada for the DC Court of Appeals because they knew he would then move up to the Supreme Court. They blocked Estrada because only Democrats are allowed to make FIRST appointments.
Will they vote against Donalds for Speaker? Absolutely they would. Will Republicans? They are called the Stupid Party for a reason.
-PJ
So was Strom Thurman until 1948
So was Ronald Reagan...
Not crazy about the idea of using identity politics in this crisis to put the Dems in a box, but in my opinion, I like him based on his own abilities.
Yeah that's a big no from me. A one-news-cycle story and now you'll never get him out of the Speaker chair until we lose the House, which will be a lot faster if Mushmouth gets the gavel.
Clap, Clap Clap. Great idea…. Unlikely but great idea.
Donald’s entry into Speakership race will give him enough Conservative votes
to prevent another RINO from winning.
And that’s a good thing.
Just more nonsense from Root - the Democrats don’t vote for the Republican nominee and vice versa. Their own nominee is also black, making this even more nonsensical. Typical of Root, however. Why people listen to people like this is beyond me. Use your mind.
This is the guy who claimed “everybody” he knew who got vaccinated either died or became very seriously ill.
It doesn’t make any sense what Root said. What’s more, Donalds doesn’t play the race card. He really is very competent and he fully supports Trump. He can think on his feet and he knows the issues.
I like the guy but Im so tire of black this and black that. Id imagine even a lot of black folks are tired of hearing it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.