Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red6

This is about home defense, not taking out a body-armored soldier on some battlefield. It’s more likely you’d be up against more than one urban-intruder IN YOUR HOME or AT YOUR FRONT DOOR.


220 posted on 10/12/2023 12:21:02 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

It mentioned Israel.

https://img.haarets.co.il/bs/00000187-4bfb-dde0-afb7-7ffb174b0001/07/6a/4557ff364a24ace91cec109ea1d8/30947.jpg?precrop=1467,1467,x484,y0&height=700&width=700

Body armor is not uncommon today.

Also, the idea of a target rich environment isn’t absurd. Think after Katrina, or LA 1992 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots)...

It just depends on the situation.

A shotgun is better for survival against a natural threat (more versatile).

556 is better in an apocalyptic scenario where society is breaking down (even though it might be regional/local and temporary).

The latter gets shrugged off, but it happens even here in the US. When things get bad enough, there won’t be any police as with Katrina. They will be worried about their own life and family.


226 posted on 10/12/2023 1:26:19 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson