Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grant program for Black women entrepreneurs blocked by federal appeals court
Seattle Times ^ | 10/1/2023 | Alexandra Olsen

Posted on 10/01/2023 5:49:57 PM PDT by simpson96

NEW YORK (AP) — A grant program for businesses run by Black women was temporarily blocked by a federal appeals court in a case epitomizing the escalating battle over corporate diversity policies.

The 2-1 decision by the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily prevents the Fearless Fund from running the Strivers Grant Contest, which awards $20,000 to businesses that are at least 51% owned by Black women, among other requirements.

In a statement Sunday, the Atlanta-based Fearless Fund said it would comply with the order but remained confident of ultimately prevailing in the lawsuit. The case was brought by the American Alliance for Equal Rights, a group run by conservative activist Edward Blum, who argues that the fund violates a section of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits racial discrimination in contracts. “We strongly disagree with the decision and remain resolute in our mission and commitment to address the unacceptable disparities that exist for Black women and other women of color in the venture capital space,” the Fearless Fund said.

The order, issued Saturday, reversed a ruling Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash which denied the American Alliance’s request to halt the program. The majority on the three-judge panel wrote that the Fearless Fund’s program’s is “racially exclusionary” and that Blum’s group is likely to prevail.

“The members of the American Alliance for Equal Rights are gratified that the 11th Circuit has recognized the likelihood that the Fearless Strivers Grant Contest is illegal,” Blum said in a statement. “We look forward to the final resolution of this lawsuit.”

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: discrimination; equalrights; fearlessfund; georgia; race; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: simpson96

B. Rashus


21 posted on 10/01/2023 8:51:50 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
The majority on the three-judge panel wrote that the Fearless Fund’s program’s is “racially exclusionary” and that Blum’s group is likely to prevail.

Disappointing.. A better option would be to say who cares and get rid of the CRA.
22 posted on 10/01/2023 11:54:11 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson