What would the Communists running our government do regarding installing a poster child for those 'crazy Trump supporters' at the Crapitol that the media could then show during their post J6 coverage? They'd put horns on some dude and paint his face, making him out to be some Trump wacko, that's what they'd do. But they'd also make sure he knew the inner workings of the Crapitol and where all the doors were so he could lead others into their TRAP.
Not sure it matters what is really going on with that strange dude. He will be forever remembered as the kook with the horns. He chose and crafted that image and he is stuck with it.
Sorry, this idiot needs mental treatment. Him and others have caused Trump no end of embarrassment for their actions at the Capital.
BTT
This guy is my hero. LOL.
BKMK
“Mostly harmless.” In one of Douglas Adams’ novels, the most intelligent species on the planet, dolphins, sum up humanity as “mostly harmless.” That’s the first thought I have when I think of Jacob Chansley, although simply “harmless,” may be more apt.
He says he never called himself the “Q-Anon Shaman.” He blames the “Mockingbird media” for that label. However, he does consider himself to be a Shaman. After he started talking about lei lines, I almost gave up. I kept listening until 11 minutes in.
He says the term “conspiracy theorist” came into vogue after the shooting of JFK.
For some reason, Democrats can believe in any number of conspiracies without ever being labelled “conspiracy theorists.” While never stated, it seems that someone who believes in an acceptable conspiracy is not a conspiracy theorist. However, anyone who believes in an unacceptable (kooky?) conspiracy is a “conspiracy theorist.” It makes no sense, but indoctrination speech is not about logic.
It is clear that Jacob Chansley believes in more conspiracies than I do. I think he is mistaken, but so too are those who leave it to the New York Times to judge what is or is not an acceptable conspiracy and who is or is not a “conspiracy theorist.”
Jacob Chansley is harmless. The New York Times is not.