Why did Tucker Carlson express skepticism about the collapse of WTC-7?

Rumble ^ | 9/11/2023 | CLANSON

[CharlesOConnell]

Compiled Footage of WTC 7'S Collapse.

https://rumble.com/v12vc13-compiled-footage-of-wtc-7s-collapse.html

[DouglasKC]

I am not an expert about this, but I believe it takes weeks if not months to prepare a building for a controlled demolition, including exposing and strategically placing charges on load bearing members by clearing out floors, rugs, walls, etc. I don't see how this could be done without closing the building

That's exactly right. I wouldn't put anything past anyone in the government but I don't think these self proclaimed experts realize just how much and how heavy the debris was from the twin towers. Anything even remotely close was going to have massive steel columns and heavy concrete impact it. They act like the towers fell but no other buildings would have been affected at all.

[DouglasKC]

My former company owned the twenty something story hotel that also was destroyed by falling debris that caught their building on fire. I find that this conspiracy theory about controlled demolition seems to be promoted by people with little or no knowledge of structural engineering. The main reason why these structures collapsed was the engineers never foresaw that there would be multiple structural fires all at the same time. There was not enough water in the main lines to provide for fire suppression in two 100 story buildings. Then a third, fourth, fifth and sixth building all caught on fire. There just was not enough water available to put out all the fires.

Thank you for inserting more sense into this.

[bantam]

One problem, Diesel doesn’t explode.

[newzjunkey]

The building fell entirely because of the events that day. Nothing more, nothing less. No controlled demolition. The nation was caught flat footed. I have always been more interested in any other attacks that could not get off the ground.

[srmanuel]

Here’s an article that indicates Diesel can explode, it requires a higher flash point than regular gasoline.

https://drivinvibin.com/2022/12/14/is-diesel-more-explosive-than-gasoline/

Sustained heat caused by fire can raise the temperature to the point of explosion.

[Diggity]

It was done over the summer before. Use to be a long video about it but it has been taken down.

It was done while elevator shafts were having maintenance and the mossad “art students” placed the charges.

[Sacajaweau]

surveyors were stationed all around...watching the tilt....

[Diggity]

I was watching cnbc at the moment that the 2nd tower blew.

There was no airliner but there was a small cessna that flew behind the building an instant before the explosion.

They use to be an 8 hour replay of cnbc/nbc news of that day on YT but they scrambled the instant right before the explosion and the cessna was obscured.

Any video of the airliner hitting the 2nd tower is fake.

In fact, there were no planes involved in any of the buildings.

Tucker discounts the 9/11 story and he also supposedly said the 2020 election was not stolen so I am not sure what role Tucker is actually playing and I don’t really pay any attention to him.

[srmanuel]

The other problem with diesel is once it explodes or catches fire, it burns at a much higher temperature than regular gasoline.

https://captainpatio.com/gasoline-diesel-kerosene

When those jets hit Tower 1 and 2 of the WTC, jet fuel has a significant mixture of kerosene in it, meaning jet fuel burns at higher temperature than regular gasoline.

[woodbutcher1963]

This fact about the lack of water was reported many times.
The FDNY said that IF only one building had been hit that they most likely would have been able to put the fire out or at least keep it contained to the one building.
That the internal sprinkler system would have suppressed the fire enough for the fire department to eventually put it out. That does not mean that there would not have still been hundreds of deaths if not thousands. Especially of the people in the upper floors above the fire. People also forget that they blew up a truck bomb in the basement parking garage once before. That it blew out several of the structural columns yet the building did NOT collapse. However, that fire did not contain thousands of gallons of jet fuel. It also happened in the parking garage where the only other items to catch fire were the automobiles. On the upper floors there is a lot more fuel for the fire to consume.

[Rattlesnake_Snook]

On 9/11, Israelis were found celebrating and dancing as the Twin Towers were destroyed and thousands of Americans were slaughtered.

These Israeli’s were arrested, found to be linked to Mossad, and they were quickly deported back to Israel. It was confirmed that they had private knowledge of the terrorist attack, and said that they were there to “document it”

The US Government AND the FBI both had footage of the Israeli’s celebrating the terrorist attack, photos of them high-fiving, and holding a lighter up as the Towers burned were both captured on film and on their own cameras.

You can’t find those photos or footage anywhere. They’re completely wiped from the internet and from public access.

Why?

Because on January 27th 2014, the US Government had them destroyed.

https://twitter.com/LaurenWitzkeDE/status/1701080121992454148

Shortly after AA77 allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, the FBI confiscated all surveillance videos. In the video obtained through a lawsuit by @JudicialWatch
, you can see that no plane crashed into the Pentagon, but rather a missile.

The questions that arise for me are as follows:
▪️What did the US government know, and why did they bomb the Pentagon?
▪️What happened to AA77, especially to the people on board?
▪️How can people still believe the official version?

The US elite doesn’t hesitate to harm millions of people (see Covid); why would they hesitate to kill a few thousand countrymen for “the greater good”?

https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1701216619370876991

[Tom Tetroxide]

Back to the Future movies and 9/11.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFqOJO1Gn34&ab_channel=ChristianVideoVault

[basalt]

can someone tell me me what the supposed meaning is of a building 7 collapsing??....it was hours after the attacks....thousands were already dead...the building was EMPTY. Why do you all act like this had some huge meaning??..can anyone explain?

[woweeitsme]

The theory behind it was that WTC7 housed CIA information. Supposedly, it was information that was related to the attack. I’m not taking one side or the other because I don’t necessarily believe conspiracy theorists or our government.

[Wuli]

1. Planned demolitions include explosions at the base of the buildings, but explosions at the base of the Twin Towers is not what happened and not what brought them down.

2. Understanding the unique ebgineering of the Twin Towers (no modern high rise stucture like them) together with the damage and heat from the two airplane strikes, is sufficient for understanding how the buildings collapsed.

[higgmeister]

On video, the fall of WTC-7 appears to present the pattern of a perfectly coordinated demolition.

Appears that way to a weak minded fool.

[T.B. Yoits]

...had studied architecture and knew it was a steel building.

Not just that it was a steel building but that it was built without a central concrete core and instead relied on an external skeleton. Once that the external skeleton was compromised, the building was coming down.

[ptsal]

Bkmk

[T.B. Yoits]

Diesel doesn’t explode.

High temperatures or high pressure will cause diesel to ignite. It doesn't even need an ignition source if pressurized enough like in a diesel engine.

[MNDude]

Maybe heat will cause steel to collapse, but not every beam simultaneously like a controlled demolition.