Kodama claims that burying the trees will prevent them from allegedly “spewing” carbon back into the air.
I'm not a scientist but trees don't "spew" CO2.
Posted on 09/07/2023 7:25:15 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
We’re regret to inform you that Bill Gates is at again, pushing his “fuzzy science.” Gates is now advocating for the removal of 70 million acres of trees to combat “global warming.” Yes, this sounds harebrained, but could there be more to Gates’ agenda than just chopping down trees in the name of lowering carbon dioxide? Many critics who view Gates as a constant schemer with a vision for a New World Order suspect he has an even bigger plan in the works. More on that below.
First, the background from Slay News:
Gates’s organization, Breakthrough Energy, has plowed $6.6 million into the project led by Kodama Systems.
The move will see 70m acres of forests, mostly in the Western United States, cut down.
After the trees have been chopped down, they will be buried. According to the project organizers, “scientists” say “burying trees can reduce global warming.”
Kodama claims that burying the trees will prevent them from allegedly “spewing” carbon back into the air.
The coordinators of the project are choosing to reap the salable carbon offsets by burying the biomass in dry & oxygen-free “earthenvaults.”
Critics point out that the trees targeted for removal won’t be available for home construction. This could make things worse for the already unstable and expensive U.S. housing market and hit the middle class especially hard...
(Excerpt) Read more at revolver.news ...
Bill Gates and his god complex will fit right in with the Book of Revelation. I always thought one third of vegetation would be gone due to war, but it might be due to one crackpot.
“burying the trees will prevent them from allegedly “spewing” carbon back into the air.”
Another “Trust the science” moment.
If this had even a remoteness of truth, why all the continued anxiety over a paltry South American rain forest? How do the tree huggers feel about this idea? I would imagine they will find some way of rationalizing it.
Kodama claims that burying the trees will prevent them from allegedly “spewing” carbon back into the air.
I'm not a scientist but trees don't "spew" CO2.
Trees convert CO2 into oxygen. Photosynthesis at work. Bill Gates is 🌰 nuts.
Carbon is life. The entire surface of the earth has been turned into a carbon cycle by billions of years of life.
BILLIONS
Trees convert CO2 into oxygen and stored energy that it uses for life, as do all photosynthesizing plants. Many of those plants go on to become energy for other plants as well as herbivores. Plants are life. Carbon is life. We are all carbon based life forms. Burying trees is an effort to interrupt the life cycling of carbon. If your bury it, it will get compressed and turn into ‘fossil fuels’ like coal and crude oil. This means you are just delaying the release and utilizing of the stored energy.
Whoever said desertification of the planet is partially right. These people are anti-life. It almost seems like they want to turn the planet into a barren rock without life supporting organic compounds or a life supporting atmosphere with oxygen.
Who are the overlords of people like gates and the globalist s? Is it AI or some other non-carbon based life forms?
Hmmm. Boston University article would seem to dispel this notion. The left needs to get their lies straight.
The oaks are just too greedy.
When I was a kid, we were taught that trees consume CO2 and give off oxygen.
Now we are told the exact opposite is suppose to be true.
I wonder what the actual factual scientific correct answer is?
Kodama claims that burying the trees will prevent them from allegedly “spewing” carbon back into the air.
= = =
Better smash and bury all wooden structures also.
And furniture, and ___________
They have been spewing carbon for a long time.
Fits Gates de-population scheme - the fewer trees, the lower the atmospheric content, the fewer animals, like humans, exist. Logic not necessary.
gates buying AB stock could tank it worse than dylan mulvaney promo once people figure out what kinda poison gates will be adding to their beverage delivery system.
hey may get deeper penetration than his bio-mosquito delivery system???
Someone who shutdown PCs by clicking on ‘start’...
Burying trees might slow down production but will not stop anything.
Trees convert CO2 into oxygen. Photosynthesis at work. Bill Gates is 🌰 nuts.
~~~
To be fair, I get what they are suggesting. While the trees are young and growing, they are converting CO2 into Oxygen and stored carbohydrates, BUT, when the plants die the cellulose and other stored carbons go back into the upper biome. Most of it is consumed by larger life forms but also by microbes, but that is when CO2 gets release back out.
That’s why I say it’s a cycle.
We don’t live on a rock like the moon or pluto because we have had life on the surface of the earth for billions of years. In many places the organic layering is very deep and you’d have to dig a loooong way to get to bedrock. Even some forms of rock are the product of organic life, such as limestone.
These people think they are going to interrupt the cycling of carbon all while they are sitting on top of hundreds of feet of it.
They do once they die and rot.
The theory behind this project is to cut down living trees which have already converted CO2 into wood fibers, and bury the trees in such a way that the CO2 isn't re-released as the tree rots.
The second step, not outlined in this article, is to plant new trees to replace the ones cut down, thereby capturing even more CO2 from the atmosphere, and to repeat the process once these new trees mature and capture (the proper Greenie term is "sequester") more CO2 from the atmosphere.
It's stupid, it's unsustainable (how much CO2 will be generated in the process of cutting down the trees and hauling them to their permanent resting place?) BUT it does make sense on its surface to the Greenies.
Just think how much diesel fuel that would be needed for Cat’s to do it.
“I’m not a scientist but trees don’t “spew” CO2.”
There is no photosynthesis when trees are dead and buried with no sunlight and no oxygen.
Does Gates have an investment in a company that is involved in non-wood building materials?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.