Ukraine Has DESTROYED Itself as NATO Admits Defeat

“It’s kinda funny, though. You have a problem with pics of pretty girls...”

Not at all; I very much appreciate beauty, and that includes beautiful women. I have pictures of beautiful women (paintings, photos, drawings) displayed in our home; but they are tasteful, and there is nothing lewd or lascivious about them.

But filling one’s profile page with scantily clad women is something only a kid would do; a kid who suffers from arrested development, and/or who is very insecure. Both of which pretty much describe you.

“... but yet you worship a guy who pulled out his pecker on tv and played a piano with it.”

Again, you jump to conclusions and rush to judgment — so typical of someone who cannot present a cogent argument —
and ignore my many past posts wherein I say I support Ukraine defending itself IN SPITE OF who its president is. Do you understand the English language, son? Do you know what “in spite of” means?

“I guess if my page were full of faggots, I’d hear nary a peep from you (well, maybe some compliments).”

Nice try, kid.

You and a couple other juvenile FReepers are obsessed with sex and anything dealing with sex; and you will generally denigrate any conversation down to something with a sexual content, reference, or simile.

You have a smutty obsession, kid; and you may want to seek professional help.

"Not at all; I very much appreciate beauty, and that includes beautiful women. I have pictures of beautiful women (paintings, photos, drawings) displayed in our home; but they are tasteful, and there is nothing lewd or lascivious about them."

Sure you do, grandpa. Sure you do.

"But filling one’s profile page with scantily clad women is something only a kid would do; a kid who suffers from arrested development, and/or who is very insecure. Both of which pretty much describe you."

You seem to have spent considerable time and effort looking at my page. Again, the only people around here who have ever complained, curiously, have been trolls and bitter old hags. Both of which pretty much describe you. :-)

"Again, you jump to conclusions and rush to judgment — so typical of someone who cannot present a cogent argument — and ignore my many past posts wherein I say I support Ukraine defending itself IN SPITE OF who its president is. Do you understand the English language, son? Do you know what “in spite of” means?"

You're all about jumping to conclusions, grandpa. Always false. But your worship for the corrupt dictator, along with the rest of your globalist clique, is there for all to see.

"You and a couple other juvenile FReepers are obsessed with sex and anything dealing with sex; and you will generally denigrate any conversation down to something with a sexual content, reference, or simile. You have a smutty obsession, kid; and you may want to seek professional help."

I ain't the one worshipping the pervert who pulled his pecker out to play a piano. Does your wife know ? Nice try, grandpa.

“You seem to have spent considerable time and effort looking at my page.”

No; I looked at it once.

“Again, the only people around here who have ever complained, curiously, have been trolls and bitter old hags.”

You associate my pointing out your obvious obsession with scantily-clad women with complaining about a beautiful woman. Nothing could be further from the truth. I merely pointed out your obsession, and one you have presented on a public site. Grown-ups don’t fill a public forum with images of scantily-clad women, unless that forum is devoted to that specific subject. Which FR isn’t.

“You’re all about jumping to conclusions, grandpa. Always false. But your worship for the corrupt dictator, along with the rest of your globalist clique, is there for all to see.”

Nice try, kid. Your comment is one of the clearest examples of YOU jumping to conclusions.

“I ain’t the one worshipping the pervert who pulled his pecker out to play a piano.”

And neither am I. But, again, you have just proved that YOU are the one jumping to conclusions.

“Does your wife know?”

Does my wife know about these posts? Absolutely. She thinks you’re a pervert.

"No; I looked at it once."

Sure. Your wife know you're looking at such things, gramps ?

"You associate my pointing out your obvious obsession with scantily-clad women with complaining about a beautiful woman."

Are you a psychiatrist ? I also have pictures of other things like political candidates. Does that make me obsessed with them, too, Dr. Freud ? I happened to post pictures of some lovely actresses I found to be attractive. Not a thing wrong with that. I'm curious about the "portraits" you have hanging in your house. These are just pics in cyberspace. I wonder if we'd find your tastes "obsessive" or "creepy", not to mention "juvenile." Eh, grandpa ?

"Nothing could be further from the truth. I merely pointed out your obsession, and one you have presented on a public site. Grown-ups don’t fill a public forum with images of scantily-clad women, unless that forum is devoted to that specific subject. Which FR isn’t."

Actually, the real point is that you seem singularly obsessed with me and what I do, which is really none of your concern. The last concern trolls and bitter old hags championing leftist causes and candidates who complained about my page (which you'd have to actively seek out AND then scroll a distance down to, hardly "out in the open") were laughed off FR. My page has been fully vetted by the mods, and even JimRob. But feel free to report me to them if you're so inclined, Gramps. As for what FR is about, it can mean appreciation for many things. Some for sports, some for automobiles, some for politics & history, some for travel, some for architecture. Mine happens to be for lovely women. "Nice try, kid. Your comment is one of the clearest examples of YOU jumping to conclusions."

Nice try, grandpa. Wrong again, as always.

"And neither am I. But, again, you have just proved that YOU are the one jumping to conclusions."

And yet you and your clique are there to defend the pervert totalitarian dictator Zelensky over the slightest slight.

"Does my wife know about these posts? Absolutely. She thinks you’re a pervert."

Does she know you seem to enjoy their company ?

“Sure. Your wife know you’re looking at such things, gramps ?”

I called her into the study to see your profile page.

“I also have pictures of other things like political candidates. Does that make me obsessed with them, too, Dr. Freud?”

It might. It depends on the politicians and the context in which you present them.

“I happened to post pictures of some lovely actresses I found to be attractive.”

That’s fine. But your fixation does not appear to be the actresses themselves, but rather their posing in underwear or skimpy bathing suits. So, it’s not the actresses themselves with which you are fixated, but rather the actresses in a state of undress. That’s fine, but not on a public forum, unless that forum is dedicated to such interests, which FR is not.

“I’m curious about the ‘portraits’ you have hanging in your house. These are just pics in cyberspace. I wonder if we’d find your tastes ‘obsessive’ or ‘creepy’, not to mention ‘juvenile. Eh, grandpa?”

Well, if you find Vermeer, and Chabas, and Waterhouse, et als “juvenile;” and Garbo and Grace Kelly and Charlotte Rampling “creepy;” then you have offered a weird review of art.

“Actually, the real point is that you seem singularly obsessed with me and what I do, which is really none of your concern. “

Don’t flatter yourself. Stop posting to me, and I won’t respond. However, if you post something to which I think a response is warranted — even if not directed to me — I will respond.

“The last concern trolls...”

Of which I am not one.

“...and bitter old hags championing leftist causes and candidates...”

Again, that description does not fit me.

“...who complained about my page...”

Again, I did not complain; I merely pointed out that your profile page exhibits a juvenile obsession.

“...(which you’d have to actively seek out AND then scroll a distance down to, hardly ‘out in the open) were laughed off FR.”

It’s common to read other FReepers’ profile pages; or else, why even have them? They are not for the person who posted them (unless that person is a narcissist — and you share some of those traits); they are for other FReepers to read.
Or, are you going to say that you posted your profile page just for yourself? If so, then you really ARE a narcissist. Do you have mirrors all over your house (or, more likely, your room in your parents’ house)?

“My page has been fully vetted by the mods, and even JimRob.”

That’s fine. The thing about your profile page is not its content, by itself; but, the abundance and overuse of the subject matter; which, as I said is something only someone with arrested development, or full of insecurity, or even imprisoned, would resort to.

“But feel free to report me to them if you’re so inclined, Gramps.”

Why would I do that?

“As for what FR is about, it can mean appreciation for many things. Some for sports, some for automobiles, some for politics & history, some for travel, some for architecture. Mine happens to be for lovely women.”

Oh, yeah? Then why aren’t you posting threads about your pin-ups? If FR includes a conservative interest in scantily-clad women, then why haven’t you started threads on that subject, complete with examples from your profile page?

“And yet you and your clique are there to defend the pervert totalitarian dictator Zelensky over the slightest slight.”

Nice try, kid. For the umpteenth time: I support Ukraine defending itself in spite of who its president is.

“Does she know you seem to enjoy their company?”

On the contrary, she knows I enjoy opposing them and their arguments; such as you and yours.

"I called her into the study to see your profile page."

I'm touched.

"That’s fine. But your fixation does not appear to be the actresses themselves, but rather their posing in underwear or skimpy bathing suits. So, it’s not the actresses themselves with which you are fixated, but rather the actresses in a state of undress. That’s fine, but not on a public forum, unless that forum is dedicated to such interests, which FR is not."

You mean I'm not allowed to like pretty actresses in bikinis or revealing clothing ? Some get the smelling salts !

"Well, if you find Vermeer, and Chabas, and Waterhouse, et als “juvenile;” and Garbo and Grace Kelly and Charlotte Rampling “creepy;” then you have offered a weird review of art."

Charlotte Rampling is a little creepy, actually.

"Don’t flatter yourself. Stop posting to me, and I won’t respond. However, if you post something to which I think a response is warranted — even if not directed to me — I will respond."

Aren't you the charmer. Apply your same reasoning to your lunatic colleague who wants the eradication of Russia, including tens of millions of Christians, who all of a sudden was freaking out that I replied to her. You don't get to decide who does and doesn't respond to whatever nonsense or hate comes flowing out of your keyboard.

"Of which I am not one.;; Again, that description does not fit me."

And yet you exhibit all the hallmarks, along with "stalker."

"Again, I did not complain; I merely pointed out that your profile page exhibits a juvenile obsession."

That's both a complaint and a false judgment, for which you don't have the medical expertise in the field of psychiatry to make. In fact, I don't think you'd have mentioned this at all were I in league with your Zelensky clique. But then again, the fact you have to actively seek out my profile page and scroll down a distance to find what you deem objectionable speaks more to you than it does to me. Hypocrisy, amongst other things. Stalking, too.

"It’s common to read other FReepers’ profile pages;"

I note the ones who tend to complain about mine often have a thoroughly blank page. That's also usually the sign of a troll or disruptor. You guys give yourselves away.

"or else, why even have them? They are not for the person who posted them (unless that person is a narcissist — and you share some of those traits); they are for other FReepers to read."

Actually, mine is there to remind me that it needs badly to be updated after about a decade or so. I've still got Cruz up for '16. It's also incomplete, as I took down a much longer roster of actresses over a decade ago.

"Or, are you going to say that you posted your profile page just for yourself? If so, then you really ARE a narcissist. Do you have mirrors all over your house (or, more likely, your room in your parents’ house)?"

Are you fishing around to get a picture of me, grandpa ?

"That’s fine. The thing about your profile page is not its content, by itself; but, the abundance and overuse of the subject matter; which, as I said is something only someone with arrested development, or full of insecurity, or even imprisoned, would resort to."

Not really. Could be I appreciate beauty. Feminine beauty, that is. Not weird creeps who pull out their genitals for piano recitals.

"Why would I do that?"

Because most of your clique likes to remove or delete anything that gets in their way. Posts and posters.

"Oh, yeah? Then why aren’t you posting threads about your pin-ups? If FR includes a conservative interest in scantily-clad women, then why haven’t you started threads on that subject, complete with examples from your profile page?"

Well, gee whiz, grandpa. If I wasn't having to waste my time responding to imbeciles, maybe I could post more about my interests. I was doing cat and animal videos up until your clique decided to upend FR by turning us into a globalist warmongering for the pervert Zelensky fan club. I'd much rather be doing something else. Animal vids, architecture, lovely women, and a host of other topics.

"Nice try, kid. For the umpteenth time: I support Ukraine defending itself in spite of who its president is."

And it so happens, for the umpteenth time, that its dictator, Zelensky, is entirely responsible for the present situation (as 78% of those polled there can attest). Absent him and instead an ELECTED President cleaning up corruption and seeking a peaceful solution to relations with Russia, instead of one destroying his country, turning it into a debauched state and carrying on with child sex trafficking via his oligarch puppetmasters, maybe you'd have a lot more people sympathetic to their leader. Look at what having a pedophile degenerate career criminal INSTALLED (not elected) in D.C. has managed to do for our domestic and international reputation. We're almost as bad as the Ukraine.

"On the contrary, she knows I enjoy opposing them and their arguments; such as you and yours."

Does she know that you manage to lose every argument to us "perverts" ? ;-D

“You mean I’m not allowed to like pretty actresses in bikinis or revealing clothing ? Some get the smelling salts !”

Liking is one thing; obsession is quite different.

And, why do you feel the need to put the pictures on your profile page in the first place? You can like them without doing that; you obviously have the photos somewhere on your hard drive; just put them in a folder and pull them up in the privacy of your own room when you want to look at them. Since there is no need for you to put them on your profile page for you to view them, the only purpose for them is a “Look what I have!” declaration to whomever goes to your profile page. Which is the whole purpose of a profile page: To say something about oneself. Well, you sure as hell did that; and what you said about yourself is that you are a kid with some problems.

“Charlotte Rampling is a little creepy, actually.”

But gorgeous in her younger days.

“Aren’t you the charmer. Apply your same reasoning to your lunatic colleague who wants the eradication of Russia, including tens of millions of Christians, who all of a sudden was freaking out that I replied to her.”

Uh, who was that? Moreover, I don’t recall ANYONE on FR calling for the eradication of Russia, or of tens of millions of Christians. The vast majority of FReepers who oppose Russia’s invasion of Ukraine just want Russia to stop and go back home to Russia, per its 2013 borders.

“You don’t get to decide who does and doesn’t respond to whatever nonsense or hate comes flowing out of your keyboard.”

Again you show your ignorance. I never said anything about who can respond to my posts and who can’t. What I said was that I respond to posts to me: If you post to me I respond; if you stop posting to me (i.e., don’t post to me) I won’t respond because I will have nothing to respond to.

“And yet you exhibit all the hallmarks, along with ‘stalker.’”

Nice try, kid. Replying to your posts to me is not stalking, son. It is replying to your posts to me. Which you do in response to MY posts. So, by your logic, YOU are a stalker.

“That’s both a complaint and a false judgment, for which you don’t have the medical expertise in the field of psychiatry to make.”

I rendered my opinion; so, sue me.

“In fact, I don’t think you’d have mentioned this at all were I in league with your Zelensky clique.”

If they acted as you do I would. But, they seem to be grown ups, and not prone to such juvenile behavior as you exhibit.

“But then again, the fact you have to actively seek out my profile page and scroll down a distance to find what you deem objectionable speaks more to you than it does to me.”

You’ve lost it, kid. You have a profile page specifically FOR people to read it. Or else, why have one? Unless, as I said previously, you are a narcissist.

“I note the ones who tend to complain about mine often have a thoroughly blank page. That’s also usually the sign of a troll or disruptor. You guys give yourselves away.”

I HAD a profile page until one of YOU anti-Ukraine crazies threatened to have me doxxed, using some of the info I had on my profile page (background, etc.).

“It’s also incomplete, as I took down a much longer roster of actresses over a decade ago.”

Yup, as I said: You have an obsession.

“Are you fishing around to get a picture of me, grandpa?”

Too funny! You are delusional, kid.

“Not really. Could be I appreciate beauty. Feminine beauty, that is.”

So do I. But I don’t — and most adults don’t — post a portfolio of them in varying stages of undress on public forums that are not established for such material. conservative public forum.

“Not weird creeps who pull out their genitals for piano recitals.”

You are fixated on homosexuality, as well. Because you talk about it regularly when you talk of Zelensky (BTW: He was playing a role in a skit).

I’m done with you.

Don’t post to me again. And that also means don’t reply to this post.

"Liking is one thing; obsession is quite different."

Quite so. You seem quite obsessed with me.

"And, why do you feel the need to put the pictures on your profile page in the first place?"

You hang photos of women in your house that you "justify." Even I don't do that.

"You can like them without doing that; you obviously have the photos somewhere on your hard drive; just put them in a folder and pull them up in the privacy of your own room when you want to look at them. Since there is no need for you to put them on your profile page for you to view them, the only purpose for them is a “Look what I have!” declaration to whomever goes to your profile page. Which is the whole purpose of a profile page: To say something about oneself. Well, you sure as hell did that; and what you said about yourself is that you are a kid with some problems."

There you go again making a boatload of wrong conclusions. Not a single one of those photos is on my hard drive. Those are all links to other websites, check them to see their addresses. Regardless if they came from a website or from a hard drive, what concern at all is it of yours ?

"Uh, who was that? Moreover, I don’t recall ANYONE on FR calling for the eradication of Russia, or of tens of millions of Christians. The vast majority of FReepers who oppose Russia’s invasion of Ukraine just want Russia to stop and go back home to Russia, per its 2013 borders."

MeganC, the poster to whom you were acting like a White Knight. She has explicitly called for the eradication of Russia. I've linked and copied her post repeatedly for the edification of those who wish to know the true goal of the Zelensky supporters on FR. Quite evil. Only 7% of polled FReepers want us involved in the Ukraine. It's none of our business what Russia does with respect to its borders. Reclaiming historically Russian Crimea included.

"Again you show your ignorance. I never said anything about who can respond to my posts and who can’t. What I said was that I respond to posts to me: If you post to me I respond; if you stop posting to me (i.e., don’t post to me) I won’t respond because I will have nothing to respond to."

The bottom of your posts contradicts this statement.

"Nice try, kid. Replying to your posts to me is not stalking, son. It is replying to your posts to me. Which you do in response to MY posts. So, by your logic, YOU are a stalker."

5 will get you 10 you'll trot out the stalker claim yourself.

"If they acted as you do I would. But, they seem to be grown ups, and not prone to such juvenile behavior as you exhibit."

Juvenile, psychotic, menacing, threatening, vile, disgusting, ignorant, trolling, perverse and degenerate are apt descriptions of the Zelensky clique. Everything but Conservative.

"You’ve lost it, kid. You have a profile page specifically FOR people to read it. Or else, why have one? Unless, as I said previously, you are a narcissist."

Some pages are long, some are short. But you seem obsessed enough to try to go over it with a fine-toothed comb in order to attack me.

"I HAD a profile page until one of YOU anti-Ukraine crazies threatened to have me doxxed, using some of the info I had on my profile page (background, etc.)."

I don't support doxxing of FReepers (except maybe for psychos supporting mass-murder). I do support zotting. BTW, removing your page won't do much good, since the Internet Archive will likely have a snapshot of it. I could remove mine, but the same would be true for me.

"Yup, as I said: You have an obsession."

No, you have an obsession. I have an incomplete profile page that needs updating.

"Too funny! You are delusional, kid."

Sounds like a "yes."

"So do I. But I don’t — and most adults don’t — post a portfolio of them in varying stages of undress on public forums that are not established for such material. conservative public forum."

The irony of being lectured on what's "Conservative" by someone wasting oodles of JimRob's bandwith defending a corrupt globalist leftist pervert dictator in Kiev ! Nice try, grandpa.

"You are fixated on homosexuality, as well. Because you talk about it regularly when you talk of Zelensky (BTW: He was playing a role in a skit)."

I'm sick of having Sodomite degeneracy constantly in my face 24/7, and having an illegitimate regime in DC pushing said degeneracy worldwide and threatening nations who refuse to normalize and worship it. Zelensky is a willing participant in proliferating that degeneracy in his own nation in the middle of a war. Shows his priorities.

"I’m done with you. Don’t post to me again. And that also means don’t reply to this post."

And you contradicted yourself again. You can dish it, but you can't take it.

“Quite so. You seem quite obsessed with me.”

You flatter yourself. But your comment just proved your narcissism…again.

“You hang photos of women in your house that you ‘justify.’ Even I don’t do that.”

I have paintings and drawings (graphite and charcoal). I have black and white classic photographic portraits. All very tasteful. Yeah, you don’t have tasteful art in your room in your parents’ house; but I bet you have porn under your pillow; tamer stuff than what you have posted on your FR profile page, but probably only because you wanted to avoid arrest.

“There you go again making a boatload of wrong conclusions. Not a single one of those photos is on my hard drive.”

One generally posts photos and memes and other visual material from one’s computer; and it it’s on one’s computer, it’s on one’s hard drive. If you posted them from some other source or medium, so what? It changes nothing about the basis of my comment.

“Those are all links to other websites…”

Well, that tells us a lot about the types of websites you visit, and how you spend your time. That further calls attention to your obsession.

“Regardless if they came from a website or from a hard drive, what concern at all is it of yours?”

It shows what kind of weirdo you are.

“MeganC, the poster to whom you were acting like a White Knight.”

She repeatedly asked you not to post to her; yet you ignored and posted away. Just as I had asked you not to post to me, but you did it anyway. In my day, we called someone like you a lout.

“It’s none of our business what Russia does with respect to its borders. Reclaiming historically Russian Crimea included.”

You could have been Hitler’s propagandist, because that is exactly what he told Europe in 1936 when he marched into the Rhineland; in 1938 when he annexed Austria (Anschluss); in 1938 when he annexed the Sudetenland and broke up Czechoslovakia; in 1939 when he invaded Poland; in 1938 when he annexed the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia; in 1939 when he invaded Poland; in 1940 when he invaded Holland, and Luxembourg, and Belgium, and France, and Denmark, and the rest of Czechoslovakia. ALL of those countries were Germany’s neighbors!

But, of course, that means nothing to you.

“The bottom of your posts contradicts this statement.”

No; you just have no reading comprehension.
“5 will get you 10 you’ll trot out the stalker claim yourself.”

Too funny! It was YOUR definition!

“Juvenile, psychotic, menacing, threatening, vile, disgusting, ignorant, trolling, perverse and degenerate are apt descriptions of the Zelensky clique. Everything but Conservative.”

You’re talking to the mirror, kid.

“Some pages are long, some are short. But you seem obsessed enough to try to go over it with a fine-toothed comb in order to attack me.”

I am REBUTTUING you, kid. Only an insecure and paranoid kid such as yourself would think that was attacking you.

“I don’t support doxxing of FReepers (except maybe for psychos supporting mass-murder).”

Will wonders never cease?

“I do support zotting.”

Of course you do; you’re probably on the zot ping list. It’s childish. Schoolyard stuff.

“No, you have an obsession. I have an incomplete profile page that needs updating.”

Too funny!”

“The irony of being lectured on what’s ‘Conservative’ by someone wasting oodles of JimRob’s bandwith defending a corrupt globalist leftist pervert dictator in Kiev ! Nice try, grandpa.”

Then you waste oodles of JimRob’s bandwidth replying.

“I’m sick of having Sodomite degeneracy constantly in my face 24/7…”

Then stop watching it.

”You can dish it, but you can’t take it.”

Nice try, kid.

“Quite so. You seem quite obsessed with me.”

You flatter yourself. But your comment just proved your narcissism…again.

“You hang photos of women in your house that you ‘justify.’ Even I don’t do that.”

“There you go again making a boatload of wrong conclusions. Not a single one of those photos is on my hard drive.”

“Those are all links to other websites…”

Well, that tells us a lot about the types of websites you visit, and how you spend your time. That further calls attention to your obsession.

“Regardless if they came from a website or from a hard drive, what concern at all is it of yours?”

It shows what kind of weirdo you are.

“MeganC, the poster to whom you were acting like a White Knight.”

She repeatedly asked you not to post to her; yet you ignored and posted away. Just as I had asked you not to post to me, but you did it anyway. In my day, we called someone like you a lout.

“It’s none of our business what Russia does with respect to its borders. Reclaiming historically Russian Crimea included.”

But, of course, that means nothing to you.

“The bottom of your posts contradicts this statement.”

No; you just have no reading comprehension.
“5 will get you 10 you’ll trot out the stalker claim yourself.”

Too funny! It was YOUR definition!

“Juvenile, psychotic, menacing, threatening, vile, disgusting, ignorant, trolling, perverse and degenerate are apt descriptions of the Zelensky clique. Everything but Conservative.”

You’re talking to the mirror, kid.

“Some pages are long, some are short. But you seem obsessed enough to try to go over it with a fine-toothed comb in order to attack me.”

I am REBUTTUING you, kid. Only an insecure and paranoid kid such as yourself would think that was attacking you.

“I don’t support doxxing of FReepers (except maybe for psychos supporting mass-murder).”

Will wonders never cease?

“I do support zotting.”

Of course you do; you’re probably on the zot ping list. It’s childish. Schoolyard stuff.

“No, you have an obsession. I have an incomplete profile page that needs updating.”

Too funny!”

“The irony of being lectured on what’s ‘Conservative’ by someone wasting oodles of JimRob’s bandwith defending a corrupt globalist leftist pervert dictator in Kiev ! Nice try, grandpa.”

Then you waste oodles of JimRob’s bandwidth replying.

“I’m sick of having Sodomite degeneracy constantly in my face 24/7…”

Then stop watching it.

”You can dish it, but you can’t take it.”

Nice try, kid.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.