Sure. Your wife know you're looking at such things, gramps ?
"You associate my pointing out your obvious obsession with scantily-clad women with complaining about a beautiful woman."
Are you a psychiatrist ? I also have pictures of other things like political candidates. Does that make me obsessed with them, too, Dr. Freud ? I happened to post pictures of some lovely actresses I found to be attractive. Not a thing wrong with that. I'm curious about the "portraits" you have hanging in your house. These are just pics in cyberspace. I wonder if we'd find your tastes "obsessive" or "creepy", not to mention "juvenile." Eh, grandpa ?
"Nothing could be further from the truth. I merely pointed out your obsession, and one you have presented on a public site. Grown-ups don’t fill a public forum with images of scantily-clad women, unless that forum is devoted to that specific subject. Which FR isn’t."
Actually, the real point is that you seem singularly obsessed with me and what I do, which is really none of your concern. The last concern trolls and bitter old hags championing leftist causes and candidates who complained about my page (which you'd have to actively seek out AND then scroll a distance down to, hardly "out in the open") were laughed off FR. My page has been fully vetted by the mods, and even JimRob. But feel free to report me to them if you're so inclined, Gramps. As for what FR is about, it can mean appreciation for many things. Some for sports, some for automobiles, some for politics & history, some for travel, some for architecture. Mine happens to be for lovely women. "Nice try, kid. Your comment is one of the clearest examples of YOU jumping to conclusions."
Nice try, grandpa. Wrong again, as always.
"And neither am I. But, again, you have just proved that YOU are the one jumping to conclusions."
And yet you and your clique are there to defend the pervert totalitarian dictator Zelensky over the slightest slight.
"Does my wife know about these posts? Absolutely. She thinks you’re a pervert."
Does she know you seem to enjoy their company ?
“Sure. Your wife know you’re looking at such things, gramps ?”
I called her into the study to see your profile page.
“I also have pictures of other things like political candidates. Does that make me obsessed with them, too, Dr. Freud?”
It might. It depends on the politicians and the context in which you present them.
“I happened to post pictures of some lovely actresses I found to be attractive.”
That’s fine. But your fixation does not appear to be the actresses themselves, but rather their posing in underwear or skimpy bathing suits. So, it’s not the actresses themselves with which you are fixated, but rather the actresses in a state of undress. That’s fine, but not on a public forum, unless that forum is dedicated to such interests, which FR is not.
“I’m curious about the ‘portraits’ you have hanging in your house. These are just pics in cyberspace. I wonder if we’d find your tastes ‘obsessive’ or ‘creepy’, not to mention ‘juvenile. Eh, grandpa?”
Well, if you find Vermeer, and Chabas, and Waterhouse, et als “juvenile;” and Garbo and Grace Kelly and Charlotte Rampling “creepy;” then you have offered a weird review of art.
“Actually, the real point is that you seem singularly obsessed with me and what I do, which is really none of your concern. “
Don’t flatter yourself. Stop posting to me, and I won’t respond. However, if you post something to which I think a response is warranted — even if not directed to me — I will respond.
“The last concern trolls...”
Of which I am not one.
“...and bitter old hags championing leftist causes and candidates...”
Again, that description does not fit me.
“...who complained about my page...”
Again, I did not complain; I merely pointed out that your profile page exhibits a juvenile obsession.
“...(which you’d have to actively seek out AND then scroll a distance down to, hardly ‘out in the open) were laughed off FR.”
It’s common to read other FReepers’ profile pages; or else, why even have them? They are not for the person who posted them (unless that person is a narcissist — and you share some of those traits); they are for other FReepers to read.
Or, are you going to say that you posted your profile page just for yourself? If so, then you really ARE a narcissist. Do you have mirrors all over your house (or, more likely, your room in your parents’ house)?
“My page has been fully vetted by the mods, and even JimRob.”
That’s fine. The thing about your profile page is not its content, by itself; but, the abundance and overuse of the subject matter; which, as I said is something only someone with arrested development, or full of insecurity, or even imprisoned, would resort to.
“But feel free to report me to them if you’re so inclined, Gramps.”
Why would I do that?
“As for what FR is about, it can mean appreciation for many things. Some for sports, some for automobiles, some for politics & history, some for travel, some for architecture. Mine happens to be for lovely women.”
Oh, yeah? Then why aren’t you posting threads about your pin-ups? If FR includes a conservative interest in scantily-clad women, then why haven’t you started threads on that subject, complete with examples from your profile page?
“And yet you and your clique are there to defend the pervert totalitarian dictator Zelensky over the slightest slight.”
Nice try, kid. For the umpteenth time: I support Ukraine defending itself in spite of who its president is.
“Does she know you seem to enjoy their company?”
On the contrary, she knows I enjoy opposing them and their arguments; such as you and yours.