Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ought-six
"I called her into the study to see your profile page."

I'm touched.

"That’s fine. But your fixation does not appear to be the actresses themselves, but rather their posing in underwear or skimpy bathing suits. So, it’s not the actresses themselves with which you are fixated, but rather the actresses in a state of undress. That’s fine, but not on a public forum, unless that forum is dedicated to such interests, which FR is not."

You mean I'm not allowed to like pretty actresses in bikinis or revealing clothing ? Some get the smelling salts !

"Well, if you find Vermeer, and Chabas, and Waterhouse, et als “juvenile;” and Garbo and Grace Kelly and Charlotte Rampling “creepy;” then you have offered a weird review of art."

Charlotte Rampling is a little creepy, actually.

"Don’t flatter yourself. Stop posting to me, and I won’t respond. However, if you post something to which I think a response is warranted — even if not directed to me — I will respond."

Aren't you the charmer. Apply your same reasoning to your lunatic colleague who wants the eradication of Russia, including tens of millions of Christians, who all of a sudden was freaking out that I replied to her. You don't get to decide who does and doesn't respond to whatever nonsense or hate comes flowing out of your keyboard.

"Of which I am not one.;; Again, that description does not fit me."

And yet you exhibit all the hallmarks, along with "stalker."

"Again, I did not complain; I merely pointed out that your profile page exhibits a juvenile obsession."

That's both a complaint and a false judgment, for which you don't have the medical expertise in the field of psychiatry to make. In fact, I don't think you'd have mentioned this at all were I in league with your Zelensky clique. But then again, the fact you have to actively seek out my profile page and scroll down a distance to find what you deem objectionable speaks more to you than it does to me. Hypocrisy, amongst other things. Stalking, too.

"It’s common to read other FReepers’ profile pages;"

I note the ones who tend to complain about mine often have a thoroughly blank page. That's also usually the sign of a troll or disruptor. You guys give yourselves away.

"or else, why even have them? They are not for the person who posted them (unless that person is a narcissist — and you share some of those traits); they are for other FReepers to read."

Actually, mine is there to remind me that it needs badly to be updated after about a decade or so. I've still got Cruz up for '16. It's also incomplete, as I took down a much longer roster of actresses over a decade ago.

"Or, are you going to say that you posted your profile page just for yourself? If so, then you really ARE a narcissist. Do you have mirrors all over your house (or, more likely, your room in your parents’ house)?"

Are you fishing around to get a picture of me, grandpa ?

"That’s fine. The thing about your profile page is not its content, by itself; but, the abundance and overuse of the subject matter; which, as I said is something only someone with arrested development, or full of insecurity, or even imprisoned, would resort to."

Not really. Could be I appreciate beauty. Feminine beauty, that is. Not weird creeps who pull out their genitals for piano recitals.

"Why would I do that?"

Because most of your clique likes to remove or delete anything that gets in their way. Posts and posters.

"Oh, yeah? Then why aren’t you posting threads about your pin-ups? If FR includes a conservative interest in scantily-clad women, then why haven’t you started threads on that subject, complete with examples from your profile page?"

Well, gee whiz, grandpa. If I wasn't having to waste my time responding to imbeciles, maybe I could post more about my interests. I was doing cat and animal videos up until your clique decided to upend FR by turning us into a globalist warmongering for the pervert Zelensky fan club. I'd much rather be doing something else. Animal vids, architecture, lovely women, and a host of other topics.

"Nice try, kid. For the umpteenth time: I support Ukraine defending itself in spite of who its president is."

And it so happens, for the umpteenth time, that its dictator, Zelensky, is entirely responsible for the present situation (as 78% of those polled there can attest). Absent him and instead an ELECTED President cleaning up corruption and seeking a peaceful solution to relations with Russia, instead of one destroying his country, turning it into a debauched state and carrying on with child sex trafficking via his oligarch puppetmasters, maybe you'd have a lot more people sympathetic to their leader. Look at what having a pedophile degenerate career criminal INSTALLED (not elected) in D.C. has managed to do for our domestic and international reputation. We're almost as bad as the Ukraine.

"On the contrary, she knows I enjoy opposing them and their arguments; such as you and yours."

Does she know that you manage to lose every argument to us "perverts" ? ;-D

267 posted on 08/29/2023 6:42:51 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

“You mean I’m not allowed to like pretty actresses in bikinis or revealing clothing ? Some get the smelling salts !”

Liking is one thing; obsession is quite different.

And, why do you feel the need to put the pictures on your profile page in the first place? You can like them without doing that; you obviously have the photos somewhere on your hard drive; just put them in a folder and pull them up in the privacy of your own room when you want to look at them. Since there is no need for you to put them on your profile page for you to view them, the only purpose for them is a “Look what I have!” declaration to whomever goes to your profile page. Which is the whole purpose of a profile page: To say something about oneself. Well, you sure as hell did that; and what you said about yourself is that you are a kid with some problems.

“Charlotte Rampling is a little creepy, actually.”

But gorgeous in her younger days.

“Aren’t you the charmer. Apply your same reasoning to your lunatic colleague who wants the eradication of Russia, including tens of millions of Christians, who all of a sudden was freaking out that I replied to her.”

Uh, who was that? Moreover, I don’t recall ANYONE on FR calling for the eradication of Russia, or of tens of millions of Christians. The vast majority of FReepers who oppose Russia’s invasion of Ukraine just want Russia to stop and go back home to Russia, per its 2013 borders.

“You don’t get to decide who does and doesn’t respond to whatever nonsense or hate comes flowing out of your keyboard.”

Again you show your ignorance. I never said anything about who can respond to my posts and who can’t. What I said was that I respond to posts to me: If you post to me I respond; if you stop posting to me (i.e., don’t post to me) I won’t respond because I will have nothing to respond to.

“And yet you exhibit all the hallmarks, along with ‘stalker.’”

Nice try, kid. Replying to your posts to me is not stalking, son. It is replying to your posts to me. Which you do in response to MY posts. So, by your logic, YOU are a stalker.

“That’s both a complaint and a false judgment, for which you don’t have the medical expertise in the field of psychiatry to make.”

I rendered my opinion; so, sue me.

“In fact, I don’t think you’d have mentioned this at all were I in league with your Zelensky clique.”

If they acted as you do I would. But, they seem to be grown ups, and not prone to such juvenile behavior as you exhibit.

“But then again, the fact you have to actively seek out my profile page and scroll down a distance to find what you deem objectionable speaks more to you than it does to me.”

You’ve lost it, kid. You have a profile page specifically FOR people to read it. Or else, why have one? Unless, as I said previously, you are a narcissist.

“I note the ones who tend to complain about mine often have a thoroughly blank page. That’s also usually the sign of a troll or disruptor. You guys give yourselves away.”

I HAD a profile page until one of YOU anti-Ukraine crazies threatened to have me doxxed, using some of the info I had on my profile page (background, etc.).

“It’s also incomplete, as I took down a much longer roster of actresses over a decade ago.”

Yup, as I said: You have an obsession.

“Are you fishing around to get a picture of me, grandpa?”

Too funny! You are delusional, kid.

“Not really. Could be I appreciate beauty. Feminine beauty, that is.”

So do I. But I don’t — and most adults don’t — post a portfolio of them in varying stages of undress on public forums that are not established for such material. conservative public forum.

“Not weird creeps who pull out their genitals for piano recitals.”

You are fixated on homosexuality, as well. Because you talk about it regularly when you talk of Zelensky (BTW: He was playing a role in a skit).

I’m done with you.

Don’t post to me again. And that also means don’t reply to this post.


268 posted on 08/29/2023 7:39:29 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson