Posted on 08/21/2023 11:36:30 AM PDT by Olog-hai
An inquest into the death of a 14-year-old boy from Acaill in County Mayo has ended in Swinford Courthouse with Coroner for Mayo, Patrick O’Connor recording an Open Verdict into his death.
Joseph McGinty died in an ambulance on his way to Mayo University Hospital on 13 September 2021.
The Coroner for Mayo, Patrick O’Connor, recorded the medical cause of death as “profound adrenal pathology consistent with Addison’s Disease.”
In his recommendations, Mr O’Connor called for the Pediatric Department of Mayo University Hospital to be fully and adequately resourced so that it is in a position to provide the facilities for treatment and diagnosis for pediatric patients as would be expected of it.
The teenager died three weeks after he received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination center on 20 August 2021.
However, the coroner stated that after receiving depositions, statements and reports running to 3,500 pages and after hearing from 18 witnesses.
“None of the medical evidence presented to me during the course of this inquest and the enquiries made by me, established that there was any link whatsoever to the administration of the COVID vaccine to Joseph McGinty.”
Mr. O’Connor also stated that “there was no evidence whatsoever that he had contracted COVID nor was there any evidence whatsoever that he died from COVID”.
The inquest into his death had heard that the teenager experienced significant weight loss in the four months before his death and he was unable to hold down food. …
(Excerpt) Read more at rte.ie ...
Sounds like ulcer or defect in digestive tract.
He was losing weight for 4 months. The vax Jan was more recent. Common sense tells you this kid was already sick and should have skipped the jab. You don’t need to buy home insurance if the house is destroyed already. Vax is not a cure or prevention. It is only insurance to avoid serious attack of covid. Why would a kid with severe digestive issues be subjected to stress of the jabs?
“Addison’s Disease”. One of the symptons of this hormonal disease is weight loss.
BTW, I predict this ‘death’ will be posted multiple times in the future and attributed to the vaccines.
Predict all you want........
You seem preoccupied with defending the “vaccines”. With all due respect.
Addison’s is treatable. Whether or not the Pfizer concoction aggravated McGinty’s condition will never be uncovered now.
Olog-hai wrote: “You seem preoccupied with defending the “vaccines”. With all due respect.”
Perhaps you should address those who are preoccupied with attacking the vaccines. BTW, I don’t defend the vaccines, I post accurate information that debunks the anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult narrative that is so popular here on FR.
Why do you call that a preoccupation?
And why do you call them “vaccines”, particularly when they are/were not made in the way vaccines are made?
Again with all due respect, it seems that you are the one with the preoccupation, that being with those who question whether the substances dubbed “vaccines” and promulgated for the alleged protection against the virus dubbed “COVID-19” by the communistic United Nations’ World Health Organization are indeed what they are claimed to be.
Olog-hai wrote: “And why do you call them “vaccines”, particularly when they are/were not made in the way vaccines are made?”
Because I’m not a member of the anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult and don’t believe their narrative.
Olog-hai wrote: “Ad hominem is not an answer. Do you have an answer?”
You got your answer, the only ones who believe they are not vaccines are members of the anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult and who believe their narrative.
Olog-hai wrote: “In other words, you refused to answer me. What I “got” instead of my “answer” was two logical fallacies. Perhaps I request a logical answer in vain?”
Perhaps you should recognize that not believing in the anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult narrative is a valid answer. It isn’t a personal attack, a false dilemma, or any other type of logical fallacy.
Olog-hai wrote: “No; it is argumentum ad hominem. Saying something is a vaccine merely because a group of people say it is something else does not make it a vaccine.”
Please refer to the definition of ad hominem.
Olog-hai wrote: “Not to mention you having hijacked the thread to express bile at the object of your spite, whuch is the red herring fallacy. Conservatives champion logic while liberals eschew it.”
The anti-vaxxers are the ones who’ve hijacked this thread. the subject is “No evidence boy’s death was linked ot COVID or vaccine, inquest hears”, yet you want to debate the definition of vaccine.
“anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult”
Vaxxes are medical Russian roulette created by greedy and ruthless Big Pharma companies.
If that is a “conspiracy theory” so be it.
cgbg wrote: “Vaxxes are medical Russian roulette created by greedy and ruthless Big Pharma companies. If that is a “conspiracy theory” so be it.”
It is a conspiracy theory because vaccines save millions of lives every year.
“vaccines save millions of lives every year”
Wacko claim—supported by “evidence” produced by Big Pharma whores.
cgbg wrote: “Wacko claim—supported by “evidence” produced by Big Pharma whores.”
Supported by far better evidence than the evidence that supports the anti-vaxxer narratives.
“Ad hominem” literally means “to the man”. My question was (to reiterate yet again) how you know the substances claimed to be vaccines produced by Pfizer (particularly in this instance) and others can be considered vaccines particularly when their production was so radically unlike how vaccines are produced (for starters); and your reply (repeatedly) seems to be that they must be vaccines because a subset of people firmly insist that these substances are not vaccines but instead harmful substances, and attacking their sanity, which is not an answer but actually two logical fallacies in one, namely the attack on person and the distraction tactic while saying absolutely nothing about the substances claimed to be vaccines at all.
Your apparent animus against so-called “anti-vaxxers” has left you unable to answer my question and instead retreat into liberal-like emotionalism. I’m sorry to see that you do not want to answer my question dispassionately without descending into tirades about “anti-vaxxers” whom I did not mention. Have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.