political hacks say what?
It’s become ever more apparent that our country has the resources, power, and ability to achieve any result, outcome, or event that they choose. Complain about it if you must. Be outraged, and demand that someone should do something to hold these corrupt tyrants accountable. Like Parisians complaining about the Nazis ruining their fair city in 1940, there may be little recourse other than to wait for the shooting to start.
LOL because they know he is going to win and no fake virus that they create can stop that..gee, can we impeach Biden for all of the crimes he committed such as creating MULTIPLE email addresses in order to sell America to the highest bidder
the 14th Amendment, a post-Civil War provision that excludes from future office anyone who, previously, as a sworn-in public official, “engaged in insurrection or rebellion … or [had] given aid or comfort to the enemies” of the government.
When the government considers the “people” as enemies we
are not in Kansas any more.
One only needs consider a majority socialist supreme court
to understand the consequences of such a stance!
Patriots should permit no voting at all in any jurisdiction where Trump is kept off the ballot.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. /s
So, according to these legal “scholars” it is the charge that is important, not whether a person is guilty or not. That is the typical democrat position when it comes to a Republican. Well, why not, it worked against an Alaska senator and a Texan representative. We have no legal system in this country any more.
TRUMP 2024
We the People’s choice.
Scholars? Seriously? Those two has beens don’t have enough brain power left to light a fire.
The word “increasingly” in the headline is the blatant lie. The only thing that’s “increasing” is CNN asking leftists what they think about the eeeevvvvil Trump.
Lying media predictive programming for what the leftists are actually trying to do in the states where he’s targeted...make him ineligible to be on those swing state ballots.
The real motive.
Stalin would be laughing
“Prominent conservative legal scholars are increasingly raising a constitutional argument that 2024 Republican candidate Donald Trump should be barred from the presidency because of his actions to overturn the previous presidential election result.”
First sentence has five embedded lies, based on a not very attentive cursorily glance:
1. Prominent legal scholars
2. Prominent conservative scholars
3. Scholars
4. Barred from presidency
5. Actions to overturn election
How about the Constitutiinal argument that CNN should be barred from broadcasting? The Biden Doctrine, that no Amendment is absolute, would definitely allow that.
i believe this bunch thinks constitutionally DJT should not be able to breathe, much less run for Prez. come on, folks.
“The people who wrote the 14th Amendment were not fools. They realized that if those people who tried to overturn the country, who tried to get rid of our peaceful transitions of power are again put in power, that would be the end of the nation, the end of democracy,”
So Called Constitutional scholars?
Why would they say we are a democracy?
No conservative scholar would
The article starts out with prominent Conservative legal experts, and then lists the Atlantic and Lawrence Tribe??
No.
“...in fact, a conviction would be beside the point.” That’s it in a nutshell. Under the ruse of saving democracy, the left and many RINOs want to prevent voters from voting for the candidate of their choice.
How about Al Gore's efforts to overturn the 2000 election and the resulting so-called Brooks Brothers Riot that disrupted the vote counting at a Miami vote recount center? These were Republicans who stormed the recount center when Democrats planned to close off the recounting from Republican observers while they recounted only a subset of ballots in a back room.
Nobody accused Gore or the protesting Republicans of insurrection or rebellion for interfering with the counting of votes.
-PJ
Ah...the phd crowd telling us all what to do and think since they studied more and more about less and less.