[RoosterRedux]

I agree with you.

The problem, however, is:

• The whistleblower (acting as an "investigating officer") says he has testimony from individuals in the government who say the DOD has bodies.
• The testifying individuals (witnesses) don't have the bodies.
• The "investigating officer" doesn't have the bodies.

The DOD allegedly has the bodies and they aren't releasing anything--no records, no bodies...no comment.

Additional note:

The whistleblower says he has names of those who are involved with said "bodies" and has locations where the bodies (and downed craft) are kept. He will provide this to the appropriate Congressional committees in a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) as soon as Congress can arrange one.

[larrytown]

The whistleblower says he has names of those who are involved with said "bodies" and has locations where the bodies (and downed craft) are kept. He will provide this to the appropriate Congressional committees in a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) as soon as Congress can arrange one.

And 'this' suffices as an answer worthy of any consideration? As if all of the congressmen sitting in this fiasco couldn't get up and lead the entire assembly into said "SCIF" location themselves?

You've characterized many unbelievers as 'deniers' or being 'in denial' - this state of being comes from having to believe 'evidence' and 'testimony' with no more actual credibility than this example. After a period of time, this dog-n-pony show gets tired, and you must move to the next level of critical thinking. That these people are lying for a specific purpose, not having anything to do with the extraterrestrial.