[larrytown]

The whistleblower says he has names of those who are involved with said "bodies" and has locations where the bodies (and downed craft) are kept. He will provide this to the appropriate Congressional committees in a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) as soon as Congress can arrange one.

And 'this' suffices as an answer worthy of any consideration? As if all of the congressmen sitting in this fiasco couldn't get up and lead the entire assembly into said "SCIF" location themselves?

You've characterized many unbelievers as 'deniers' or being 'in denial' - this state of being comes from having to believe 'evidence' and 'testimony' with no more actual credibility than this example. After a period of time, this dog-n-pony show gets tired, and you must move to the next level of critical thinking. That these people are lying for a specific purpose, not having anything to do with the extraterrestrial.

[RoosterRedux]

I think you are confusing me with someone else. I have never drawn any conclusions about this situation. I do on occasion entertain the possibilities of various outcomes. Perhaps you are confused by that.

Grusch and his witnesses may be telling the truth as they know it or they may be lying for some reason we don't know at this point.

As to being able to immediately move to a SCIF, I only know what I hear and that is that an SCIF is being arranged.

If this matter is getting tiresome to you, I suggest you avoid it.

Here's something you seem unwilling to consider: Having a closed mind (like you) is indicative of a cognitive bias of some kind. Whether one has a closed mind about the absolute truth of the UFO testimony or the absolute "untruth" of it...both absolutes are equally unintelligent.

In case you are still confused, consider this:

Here are 2 stupid comments:

Person #1:

I am absolutely 100% certain the accounts of UFO's are true and accurate.

Person #2:

I am absolutely 100% certain that the accounts of UFO's are untrue and nothing but baloney.