To: 04-Bravo; 1FASTGLOCK45; 1stFreedom; 2ndDivisionVet; 2sheds; 60Gunner; 6AL-4V; A.A. Cunningham; ...
AVIATION PING!...........................
2 posted on
07/11/2023 1:27:12 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: Red Badger
That sonic boom also represents wasted energy. If we can eliminate the sonic boom, perhaps fuel economy at supersonic speeds would go up.
3 posted on
07/11/2023 1:29:26 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so stupid people won’t be offended)
To: Red Badger
ALWAYS my first question . . . . . . . why ?
5 posted on
07/11/2023 1:36:37 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true . . . I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: Red Badger
7 posted on
07/11/2023 1:42:11 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: Red Badger
“...gather data on human responses to the sound generated during supersonic flight.”
My response is “NO WAY IN HELL do I want to hear a THUMP!”
This jet will be a fuel hog, so why work on it when other parts of the SAME government are starting to say “End all jet travel because jet suck up fossil fuels, warm the planet, white supremacy air travel, blah, blah, blah.”
9 posted on
07/11/2023 1:53:08 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else.)
To: Red Badger
Unless this is John Kerry's new private globetrotting jet, I don't see the practical application for this design.
It doesn't seem scaleable for commercial passenger flights.
16 posted on
07/11/2023 2:39:15 PM PDT by
G Larry
(It is RACIST to impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants by importing Cheap ILLEGAL Labor!)
To: Red Badger
This aircraft will enable John Kerry to get to his climate change meetings faster.
17 posted on
07/11/2023 2:52:46 PM PDT by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: Red Badger
That thing’s gonna poke somebody’s eye out if they’re not careful.
To: Red Badger
Forward viz looks a bit restricted.
23 posted on
07/11/2023 4:12:05 PM PDT by
doorgunner69
(Let's go Brandon)
To: Red Badger
Canard, wing, and two sets of stabilizers on the tail. And a fuselage design that looks like it’s modified from a Constellation.
25 posted on
07/11/2023 4:39:47 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: Red Badger
Hmm ..... maybe not a good idea to name the aircraft hanger “Stall”? 8-)
26 posted on
07/11/2023 4:53:10 PM PDT by
Col Freeper
(Praise and Trust in the LORD in All Things at All Times.)
To: Red Badger
Will be more interested when they show the potential armaments it can carry next to it...
28 posted on
07/11/2023 6:01:47 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
To: Red Badger
Looks like a forgotten Century Series concept.
30 posted on
07/12/2023 5:40:48 AM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
To: Red Badger
Interesting return to the past... I have fond memories of several times having ATC tell me “You are number two for 36 Left following the Concord. Avoid wake turbulence! A memorable sight to this date!
33 posted on
07/12/2023 6:15:29 AM PDT by
ExSES
(the "bottom line")
To: Red Badger
35 posted on
07/12/2023 11:53:10 AM PDT by
devane617
(Discipline Is Reliable, Motivation Is Fleeting..)
To: Red Badger
This research could result in airplanes that could fly at Mach 1.6 with a range of around 6,000 nautical miles with very little sonic boom and engines that will meet ICAO Stage IV noise standards.
Why Mach 1.6 limit? I cite the following:
1. It means less thermal heating of the structure of the plane, so more composite materials can be used to keep the weight lower.
2. A Mach 1.6 limit means any sonic boom with such an advanced design will be very low indeed.
3. The plane don't need to run the engine with fuel-consuming reheat (neé afterburner) mode or very little use, which means higher fuel efficiency at supersonic speeds.
Both FlexJet and NetJets are very likely interested in such a plane. Both could order 40 planes for fractional ownership operations.
36 posted on
07/12/2023 1:14:07 PM PDT by
RayChuang88
(.FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
