Posted on 07/05/2023 10:45:23 AM PDT by Morgana
Donning a T-shirt with the message “Say NO to child support #ProChoiceMen,” pro-life advocate AJ Hurley trolled the Women’s March on Saturday in Washington, D.C. to expose abortion activists’ hypocrisy.
Hurley posed as a male abortion activist at the march, using a megaphone to shout phrases like “Your body, your problem!” and “Keep your womb off my wallet” at the crowd. His stunt was part of Live Action’s new satirical video series #ProChoiceMen.
The Women’s March supposedly focuses on rights and protections for women, but Hurley’s protest exposed how its support for abortion does the opposite. According to Live Action, the point was to show how abortion “primarily benefits” selfish and abusive men.
At one point in the video, Hurley engaged with a small crowd of abortion supporters, telling them: “Consent to sex is not consent to take care of your little thing, that little thing rolling around on the ground. Babies are gross. I don’t want to take care of that.”
During another part of the march, he called out his thanks to women for marching because “abortion rights” benefit men.
“If you can kill what’s in your womb because it’s your body, then I can keep my money because it belongs to me,” Hurley said, making an argument against child support. Later, he continued: “I don’t want to take care of your kids. So just kill it. … Don’t make me pay for it.”
Video Player ****VIDEO ON LINK**** 00:00 03:19
It was clear that some of the Women’s March participants did not like his message. One told him, “I hope you fall,” and another chased him around and hit him with her sign.
The early feminists described abortion as the “ultimate exploitation of women” decades before the killing practice became legal nationwide. Now, aborting unborn babies is legal in most the U.S., and mounds of evidence show how irresponsible men coerce, threaten and force women to abort their unborn babies to avoid responsibility. Some even abuse or kill both mother and child if she refuses.
When the series launched, Lila Rose, president and founder of Live Action, said they decided to use satire because they want society to really re-think the view that abortion helps women.
Rose also emphasized that there are many good, responsible men and fathers who protect and care for women and children.
“We know there are so many good men who DO cherish the women in their lives, and who DO want to be loving, responsible fathers,” she said. “You may be one of them! These truly manly men are the ones we need to build up and encourage them to influence the culture.”
Funny how everybody says that about men. Everyone just assumes that a woman has a right to a sex life without the risk of a baby. You never hear anyone to tell a woman to keep her panties on.
In cases of rape you are 100% correct. Outside of that it doesn’t make much sense.
No he wants to have a choice in the matter just like the woman does. If that baby is his shouldn’t he get to say she cannot have an abortion? If so then child support makes sense. But if she is the only one that gets to say what happens then he should have no obligation under law.
There are also women who get pregnant so they can get child support—See Hunter Biden’s baby momma for details.
But he does, i reckon at some level, pay for it.
With all due respect, your comments don’t really make me think that you DO get his point. It is not that men don’t want to take responsibility for their actions, I believe his point is that if men have no say in the status of the child’s life after conception,(my body, my choice) then women should have no say in the status of providing monetary support for the child after birth, (my wallet,my choice). Pretty sure that was his point. The only brunt he is expecting the women to bear is a result of her decision to keep or kill the child, which the women believe belongs to them and them alone. Kind of a have your cake and eat it too kind of thing.
I believe he was doing this as satire to illustrate his point that if women get to be the sole arbiter of choice with respect to what happens with the child’s life, men should be the sole arbiter of the choice of what happens to their wallets. Now, I suppose you could be of the opinion that all men would walk away from their responsibilities, but I disagree. Some adult males might walk away,but I would not consider them to be a man. They would be boys identifying as men.
You are not thinking logically. He didn’t choose to have a baby because he can’t have a baby. She chose to have a baby. If it is “Her Body, Her Choice” then her choice was to have the baby.
you have had to “deal with baby killing”? did you work in a clinic?
if not stop torturing yourself and quit looking this stuff up.
I always wonder why women are more for right to abortion than men.
at best, men should be liable for half the cost of an abortion... no child support...
her choice.
This man is just pointing out the hypocrisy of feminist abortonists. They demand a right to abort where the father gets no say in the matter and have that right. Conversely the man is saying that he should be able to keep his money if the woman has the baby.
The man in this video (and millions like him) could get a vasectomy and avoid grief but yet he expects women to bear the burnt of it all.
The man in this video (and millions like him) could get a vasectomy and avoid grief but yet he expects women to bear the burnt of it all.
I believe he was doing this as satire to illustrate his point that if women get to be the sole arbiter of choice with respect to what happens with the child’s life, men should be the sole arbiter of the choice of what happens to their wallets.
Are they?
Most of the pro-life advocates are women.
Have you looked at posters on FR? Overwhelming majority are men?
If he chooses to pay
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.